Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144309›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024

Novel techniques and future developments in minimally invasive pectus repair.

Luzia Toselli, Gaston Bellia-Munzon, Daniela Sanjurjo, Marcelo Martinez-Ferro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luzia ToselliDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Fundacion Hospitalaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6169-0303
Gaston Bellia-MunzonDepartment of Chest Wall Malformations, Clínica Mi Pectus, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8533-6384
Daniela SanjurjoDepartment of Chest Wall Malformations, Clínica Mi Pectus, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2801-8793
Marcelo Martinez-FerroDepartment of Chest Wall Malformations, Clínica Mi Pectus, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7704-0092

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the paradigm shift in the treatment of excavated deformities caused by the introduction of the Nuss technique in 1998, several innovative technical modifications and new treatment modalities have radically changed the surgical approach of pectus excavatum in the last couple of years. These new trends attain different topics. On one hand, the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing and implant customization surge as a possibility for a wider audience as 3D printers become available with lower costs. They provide the surgeon with new elements that enable precise planning, simulation, and customized prostheses amidst a tendency to abandon standardization and incorporate personalized medicine. Another topic comprises mandatory sternal elevation, in the continuous search for safety first always. Complete thoracic remodeling as a goal of repair instead of addressing only focal depressions, leaving the upper chest or focal protrusions unresolved. Finally, although the current surgical approach has evolved significantly, many groups still use lateral stabilizers or direct implant fixation with sutures or wires to the ribs. These systems continue to prove unreliable in preventing implant displacement. Fortunately, the bridge technique, described in this review, has come to address this sometimes fatal issue with encouraging results. We provide an updated overview of the latest developments regarding these concepts, related to the current state-of-the-art of the treatment of pectus excavatum.

Indexed as

bridgesFunnel cheststernal elevationthree-dimensional printing (3D printing)total chest wall remodeling

Identifiers

PMID39144309
PMCPMC11320257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.