ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Increased lung cancer recurrence following transthoracic needle biopsy.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balancing diagnostic approach and oncologic risk in surgically resected lung cancer: propensity-matched analysis of intraoperative versus percutaneous biopsy by tumor location and morphology.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) is associated with pathologically upstaged and recurrence-free survival in non-small cell lung cancer after curative surgery.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TNB) could damage lung structures and may disseminate tumor cells into the airway, blood vessels, and pleural cavity, affecting post-operative outcomes. Several studies have investigated the effects of TNB on the prognosis of patients, but the effects remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether TNB increases the risk of recurrence of resected stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: In this retrospective study, we enrolled 1,077 patients with stage IA NSCLC who underwent curative resection from 2010 to 2020. Recurrence risk factors were evaluated using Cox regression analyses. A multiple logistic regression model, including age, sex, smoking history, total tumor size, invasive tumor size, histology, histologic differentiation, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, and the number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs), was used to calculate the propensity score. Results: According to the pre-operative TNB, patients were classified into the no-TNB (n=823) and TNB (n=190) groups. After propensity score matching analysis, 380 patients were included in the no-TNB group (1:2 matching). Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that pre-operative TNB was a negative prognostic factor in patients with surgically resected stage IA NSCLC [hazard ratio (HR), 3.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-6.67; P=0.003]. The 5-year locoregional and overall recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were significantly lower in the TNB group than in the no-TNB group (88.3% Conclusions: For patients with stage IA NSCLC, pre-operative TNB was a negative prognostic factor for recurrence. Surgical diagnosis and treatment without pre-operative tissue diagnosis may be considered first in patients with clinically early lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.