Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144305›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

Priorities and strategy for the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in thoracic surgery.

Tomas Piler, Martin Schauer, Christopher Larisch, Julia Riedel, Reiner Neu, Hans-Stefan Hofmann, Michael Ried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tomas PilerDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Martin SchauerDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christopher LarischDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Julia RiedelDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Reiner NeuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Hans-Stefan HofmannDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Michael RiedDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a perioperative care protocol, which was introduced several years ago and has gained increasing importance in thoracic surgery. The aim of this study was to provide guidance through clinical implementation and to identify factors for better compliance. Methods: This prospective cohort study collected data between July 2021 and June 2022 at the Department of Thoracic Surgery (University Hospital Regensburg, Germany). A modified enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS) protocol with recommendations covering the pre-, intra- and postoperative phases was established and followed. The primary objective was to evaluate the implementation of the ERATS protocol. Secondary, specific and clinically relevant recommendations were analyzed regarding their compliance. Results: The study included 139 patients undergoing elective lung resections. Many ERATS recommendations were already part of standard perioperative care, including perioperative antibiotics, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and intraoperative warming. Other measures such as anemia management, carbohydrate loading or chest drain management were updated or newly established and standardized according to our ERATS protocol. The recommendations emphasizing early postoperative mobilization were found to be crucial. We identified three groups with significantly different compliance rates: (I) patient-dependent measures which require active participation (49.3%); (II) treatment measures requiring interdisciplinary consensus (85.8%); and (III) surgical measures (88%). Conclusions: The implementation and continuous evaluation of our perioperative ERATS protocol led to a new categorization of targeted measures into three groups with actors of different competencies. The new grouping enables gradual implementation and a step-by-step targeted approach in order to achieve a higher compliance of ERATS in the future as well as long-term sustainability.

Indexed as

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®)fast-track surgeryperioperative carethoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39144305
PMCPMC11320229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.