ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
Values of circulating tumor DNA for non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, progress and challenges: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for lung cancer remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a review to further investigate the role of ctDNA in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing NAT for individualized management. Methods: A search of online databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library) was conducted to evaluate the value of ctDNA in predicting relapse, risk stratification, and efficacy of NAT in NSCLC. Only articles published in English within the last 25 years, between January 1st, 1998 and November 30th, 2023, were included. Additionally, the application of ctDNA in NSCLC is briefly reviewed. Key Content and Findings: ctDNA is a non-invasive and dynamic method that plays an important role in future treatment guidance. Additionally, ctDNA successfully predicted the effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy before surgery, and positive testing was strongly correlated with a lower major pathological response or complete pathological response rate. Sequential testing of ctDNA may serve as a secondary indicator to guide the adjustment of treatment programs. However, the application of this method has been limited by false negative results, a lack of objective indicators, and high costs. These issues must be addressed by researchers. Conclusions: ctDNA has strong potential in NAT, based on positive preliminary studies. However, its widespread use is limited by the high cost of testing. Further research is needed to explore its value in risk stratification and treatment guidance in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.