Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144299›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

Establishing a risk prediction model for residual pulmonary vascular obstruction after regular anticoagulant therapy for non-high-risk pulmonary embolism.

Dongping Zhu, Junfei Feng, Jie Guo, Jixian Duan, Yan Yang, Jing Leng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dongping ZhuSchool of Clinical Medicine, Dali University, Dali, China.
Junfei FengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care, the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Jie GuoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care, the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Jixian DuanDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care, the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Yan YangDepartment of Reflection Imaging, the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Jing LengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care, the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) has been on the rise annually. Despite receiving regular sequential anticoagulation therapy, some patients with non-high-risk acute PE (APE) continue to experience residual pulmonary vascular obstruction (RPVO). This study sought to identify the risk factors for RPVO following 3 months of sequential anticoagulation therapy for non-high-risk PE. Machine learning techniques were utilized to construct a clinical prediction model for predicting the occurrence of RPVO. Methods: A total of 254 acute non-high-risk PE patients were included in this study, all of whom were admitted to the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province between 2020 and 2023. After 3 months of regular anticoagulant treatment, computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) were reviewed to identify the presence of RPVO. Patients were then categorized into either the thrombolysis group or the thrombosis residue group. Throughout the study period, 49 patients were excluded due to missing data, irregular treatment, or loss to follow-up. Clinical symptoms, physical signs, and laboratory results of 205 PE patients were recorded. Correlation and collinearity analyses were conducted on relevant risk factors, and significance tests were performed. Heat maps illustrating the relationships between influencing factors were generated. Predictors were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to create a predictive model. Internal validation of the model was also carried out. Results: By searching the literature to understand all the clinical indicators that may affect the efficacy of anticoagulation therapy. A total of 205 patients with non-high-risk acute pulmonary thromboembolism were evaluated for various risk factors. Five independent factors were identified by multivariable analysis-age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acratia, pulmonary systolic blood pressure (PASP), and major arterial embolism-and their P value, odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) were as follows: (P=0.012, OR =1.123; 95% CI: 1.026-1.23), (P=0.002, OR =13.30; 95% CI: 2.673-66.188), (P=0.001, OR =14.009; 95% CI: 2.782-70.547), (P=0.003, OR =1.061; 95% CI: 1.020-1.103) and (P<0.001, OR =18.128; 95% CI: 3.853-85.293), which may indicate a poor prognosis after standard anticoagulant therapy. A nomogram was constructed using these variables and internally validated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96) for the training set and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95) for the validation set. Calibration curves were utilized to assess the practicality of the nomogram. Conclusions: A novel predictive model was developed based on a single-center retrospective study to identify patients with RPVO following anticoagulant therapy for acute non-high-risk PE. This model may aid in the early detection of patients, prompt adjustment of treatment, and ultimately lead to a decrease in adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

anticoagulant therapycomputed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)machine learningnomogramNon-high-risk pulmonary thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID39144299
PMCPMC11320233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.