ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
The prognostic value of controlling nutritional status score on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy-a retrospective research.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic and clinicopathological value of the controlling nutritional status score in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Association of preoperative controlling nutritional status score with clinical outcomes among surgical patients with esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- The investigation of factors influencing the prognostic nutritional index in patients with esophageal cancer-a cross-sectional study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A variety of nutritional evaluation parameters has been documented as prognostic indicators in some malignancies. However, the prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, as one of these nutritional indices, in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear and warrants investigation. Our study sought to elucidate the prognostic value of this nutritional index in ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy. Methods: This retrospective study encompassed 314 patients diagnosed with ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between August 2016 and August 2021. CONUT scores were computed at two specific time points: prior to neoadjuvant therapy initiation and before surgery, utilizing serum albumin, total lymphocyte, and cholesterol levels of ESCC patients. Furthermore, the delta CONUT (ΔCONUT) score was derived by subtracting the preoperative CONUT score from the pretreatment CONUT score. The associations between CONUT scores and various survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression analysis. Results: Patients with a high preoperative CONUT score demonstrated a higher postoperative complication rate [odds ratio (OR) =2.009, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.150-3.510, P=0.01] compared to those in the low CONUT group. Multivariate analysis revealed that a ΔCONUT score ≥0 served as an independent negative prognostic indicator for increased postoperative complications (OR =3.008, 95% CI: 1.509-5.999, P=0.002) and poorer overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) =2.388, 95% CI: 1.052-5.422, P=0.04] in ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy combined with esophagectomy. Conclusions: A high preoperative CONUT score and a ΔCONUT score ≥0 were indicative of a poor prognostic nutritional status in ESCC patients who had undergone neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.