Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144204›Full record

ReviewFood science and biotechnology2024

Modern and conventional processing technologies and their impact on the quality of different millets.

Athira Mundassery, Jancirani Ramaswamy, Tharanidevi Natarajan, Soorya Haridas, Prema Nedungadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Athira MundasseryDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Amrita School of Physical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Ettimadai, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641112 India.
Jancirani RamaswamyDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Amrita School of Physical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Ettimadai, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641112 India.ORCID 0000-0003-0393-8902
Tharanidevi NatarajanDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Amrita School of Physical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Ettimadai, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641112 India.
Soorya HaridasDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Amrita School of Physical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Ettimadai, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641112 India.
Prema NedungadiAmrita Create, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, Kollam, Kerala 690525 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millet, the highly sustainable crop for farming and combating hunger, has recently regained a resurgence in popularity as people seek more sustainable and nutrient-dense alternatives. International organizations and research institutions have advocated for increased millet production and consumption by introducing novel technologies and machinery in response to global food security and climate change challenges. This review aims to identify the impact of modern and conventional processing technologies on the quality of different millets. A comprehensive analysis of research reviews reveals that double-stage and tabletop centrifugal dehullers, infrared roasting, pulsed light, ultrasound, high-pressure processing methods, fortification, and encapsulation are optimal for nutrient retention in various millets. Extrusion technology application in millet processing has created a diverse range of value-added products with extended shelf stability. Emphasis is needed to develop robust promotion and distribution channels and establish an export promotion forum involving all stakeholders to promote and diversify millet-based products and technologies.

Indexed as

MilletProcessingProductsTechnologies

Identifiers

PMID39144204
PMCPMC11319574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.