ReviewFood science and biotechnology2024
Review on the extension of shelf life for fruits and vegetables using natural preservatives.
Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Progress, Challenges, and Future Trends of Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP) Technology for Food and Agricultural Products: A Bibliometric Analysis (2016-2025).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Antioxidants in Plant-Based Food Matrices: From Structure-Activity and Degradation Kinetics to Formulation Design.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Biopolymer-Based Food Packaging: Functional Properties, Enhancement Strategies, and Future Perspectives.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Engineering Active PET Packaging via Corona Treatment and Natural Biocide Coating: Carvacrol andPolymers · 2026Article
- FreshTrack: an innovative IoT-sensor-driven food freshness estimation framework integrating blockchain.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Chitosan/pectin bio-composite films enriched with bioactive fraction of Acalypha indica L. as active packaging: a comparative assessment of postharvest fruit quality.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial evaluation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- "Therapeutic potential of Acalypha indica L. leaf fractions against foodborne pathogens: an in vitro and in silico study".Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Inclusion complex of lemongrass essential oil with γ-cyclodextrin: preparation, characterization, and its impact on mango fruit preservation.Food science and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Food Preservatives and the Rising Tide of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms, Controversies, and Emerging Innovations.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fruits and vegetables are important for the nutrition and health of individuals. They are highly perishable in nature because of their susceptibility to microbial growth. Foodborne pathogens create a significant problem for consumers, food businesses, and food safety. Postharvest factors, including transportation, environment, and preservation techniques, cause a reduction in product quality. The present world is using synthetic preservatives, which have negative impacts on consumer health. Food safety and demand for healthy foods among consumers, the scientific community, and the food industry resulted in the exploitation of natural preservatives, which play an important role in their effectiveness, prolonged shelf life, and safety. Natural preservatives include plants, animals, and microbiological sources with polymers to extend shelf life, improve quality, and enhance food safety. This review specifically focuses on mechanism of action of natural preservatives, spoilage of fruit and vegetables, the importance of edible film and coating on fruits and vegetables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.