Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144178›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2024

Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Customized Mucosal Vibrator in Alleviating Pain Perception Associated with Local Anesthesia Administration in Children Aged 6-10 Years.

Neeti Tatiya, Chanchal Singh, Pratik Surana, Ankita Ukey, Priyanka R Gupta, Ashida Blesson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neeti TatiyaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0099-8064
Chanchal SinghDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India.
Pratik SuranaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India.
Ankita UkeyDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India.
Priyanka R GuptaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India.
Ashida BlessonDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Rungta College of Dental Sciences and Research, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Local anesthetics are used to alleviate pain, but the prick of the injection delivering anesthesia is known to cause anxiety and pain that affect dental treatment. The most difficult aspect of pediatric dentistry is minimizing discomfort while the intraoral local anesthetic is administered. This pain has been treated using physical, psychological, pharmacological, and combinations of these approaches. Recently, the idea of vibration, which is based on the gates control theory, has gained popularity as a way to reduce discomfort while local anesthesia (LA) is being administered. Aim: The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of mucosal vibrators in children aged 6-10 years to alleviate pain associated with LA administration. Materials and methods: A total of 60 patients aged 6-10 years requiring inferior alveolar nerve block were enrolled for this randomized, single-blind clinical trial. In group I, before and during LA administration, the customized mucosal vibrator was placed at the injection site. In group II, the topical local anesthetic gel was applied to the injection site prior to the administration of LA. Then, the local anesthetic solution was deposited using a disposable syringe needle on both groups. The pain was evaluated using the physiological scale (pulse rate and oxygen saturation), the subjective scale (Wong-Baker scale), and the objective scale [Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale] by an experienced assistant who was unaware of the procedure. Results: A customized mucosal vibrator along with local anesthetic injections resulted in significantly less pain ( Conclusion: The results show that the customized mucosal vibrator is an effective and inexpensive means to reduce pain during LA administration. How to cite this article: Tatiya N, Singh C, Surana P,

Indexed as

Customized mucosal vibratorLocal anesthesiaNeedle phobiaPainTopical anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID39144178
PMCPMC11320810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.