ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2024
A Comparative Evaluation of the Remineralization Potential of Two Contemporary Bioactive Glass-containing Dentifrices on Artificially Demineralized Human Enamel: An
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of remineralisation potential using BioHAP, CPP-ACP and Enamelon on root dentin: AnBioinformation · 2026Article
- Comparative Assessment of the Remineralization Potential of Five Modern Oral Health Products on Bovine Enamel.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is limited literature comparing the remineralization potential of these two dentifrices, Elsenz™, which contains fluoro calcium (Ca) phosphosilicate, and Shy-NM™, which contains Ca sodium phosphosilicate, are a few of the remineralizing agents. Aim: To assess and compare the remineralization potential of Elsenz™ and Shy-NM™ dentifrices on artificially induced carious lesions on permanent teeth, using the Vickers microhardness measuring method and scanning electron microscope (SEM) connected to energy dispersive X-ray analysis after laboratory stimulation of the oral environment employing the pH cycling model. Materials and methods: A total of 30 sound human premolar teeth were divided into six groups for both parameters. Group I-Elsenz™ dentifrice, group II-Shy-NM™ dentifrice, and group III-control. The surface microhardness (SMH) of the test specimens was evaluated followed by a scanning electron microscope with energy dispersive analysis (SEM-EDAX). The specimens were tested at baseline, demineralization, and remineralization. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis. Results: Surface microhardness following remineralization with Elsenz™ was 359 Vickers hardness number (VHN), and with Shy-NM™ was 312 VHN. Elsenz™ showed significantly higher remineralization compared to Shy-NM™ ( Conclusion: Within the scope of this study, the incorporation of fluoride in bioactive glass (BAG) in Elsenz™ had the potential to remineralize enamel better than Shy-NM™ dentifrice. It can, therefore, be concluded that Elsenz™, when compared with Shy-NM™, would be effective in inhibiting demineralization. How to cite this article: Thoutam SV, Kumar S, Naidu J. A Comparative Evaluation of the Remineralization Potential of Two Contemporary Bioactive Glass-containing Dentifrices on Artificially Demineralized Human Enamel: An
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.