ArticleThe British journal of cardiology2023
Cardiac catheterisation: avoiding common pitfalls with transradial vascular access.
Article in The British journal of cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transradial access in interventional gynecology and obstetrics: Current evidence, clinical applications, and future directions.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2026Review
- Clinical and Electrophysiological Assessment of Peripheral Nerve Function After Transradial Angiography: A Prospective Study.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2026Article
- A concentric tube catheter for endoluminal interventions, steered and imaged via magnetic resonance imaging.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- Incidence, classification, healing patterns, and vascular remodeling of radial artery dissection assessed by OCT.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Distal radial access in interventional cardiology: technique, pitfalls and recommendations.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac catheterisation is a common invasive procedure. Transradial vascular access is the default approach due to a reduced risk of vascular and bleeding complications. Although transradial vascular access complications are infrequent it is important to identify, mitigate and manage them appropriately when they arise. Several techniques have been identified to try to reduce their occurrence pre- and post- procedurally, as well as manage any complication sequalae. This review article summarises the incidence, type, prevention and management of complications encountered in transradial vascular access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.