Imaging diagnostics of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a narrative review with current status and future directions.

Background and Objective: The incidence rate of lung cancer, which also has the highest mortality rates for both men and women worldwide, is increasing globally. Due to advancements in imaging technology and the growing inclination of individuals to undergo screening, the detection rate of ground-glass nodules (GGNs) has surged rapidly. Currently, artificial intelligence (AI) methods for data analysis and interpretation, image processing, illness diagnosis, and lesion prediction offer a novel perspective on the diagnosis of GGNs. This article aimed to examine how to detect malignant lesions as early as possible and improve clinical diagnostic and treatment decisions by identifying benign and malignant lesions using imaging data. It also aimed to describe the use of computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsies and highlight developments in AI techniques in this area. Methods: We used PubMed, Elsevier ScienceDirect, Springer Database, and Google Scholar to search for information relevant to the article's topic. We gathered, examined, and interpreted relevant imaging resources from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University's Imaging Center. Additionally, we used Adobe Illustrator 2020 to process all the figures. Key Content and Findings: We examined the common signs of GGNs, elucidated the relationship between these signs and the identification of benign and malignant lesions, and then described the application of AI in image segmentation, automatic classification, and the invasiveness prediction of GGNs over the last three years, including its limitations and outlook. We also discussed the necessity of conducting biopsies of persistent pure GGNs. Conclusions: A variety of imaging features can be combined to improve the diagnosis of benign and malignant GGNs. The use of CT-guided puncture biopsy to clarify the nature of lesions should be considered with caution. The development of new AI tools brings new possibilities and hope to improving the ability of imaging physicians to analyze GGN images and achieving accurate diagnosis.