ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Meibography signal intensity as a novel image biomarker for meibomian gland function: evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), one of the most common ocular surface diseases, can induce dry eye and reduce patients' quality of life. Methodological limitations have resulted in contradictory interpretations of gland function. This study sought to investigate the correlation between meibography signal intensity (SI) and meibomian gland (MG) function and to validate an MGD classification strategy based on different levels of SI. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 817 eyes from 361 patients with MGD and 52 healthy controls. Additionally, 78 eyes from 39 patients with MGD who had undergone LipiFlow treatment were recruited for longitudinal analyses. The SI value was obtained via meibography using an automated analyzer, and all participants underwent ocular surface examinations. A cross-sectional analysis was performed to determine SI distribution and its relationship to clinical characteristics via a generalized estimating equation model. Longitudinal analyses were conducted on the treatment cohort using a mixed-effects model to explore the outcome in different SI levels. Results: Regression analysis revealed significant correlations between SI and lipid layer thickness (β=0.016), meibum expressibility (β=-0.676), meibum quality (β=-0.251), and fluorescein-stained tear-film break-up time (FBUT) (β=0.064) (all P values <0.001 for the above associations). Low-level SI MGD cases exhibited the most severe clinical signs, including the worst meibum expressibility (16% for level 3) and quality scores (19% for level 3), the shortest FBUT (3.82±0.13 s), and the thinnest lipid layer (65.68±2.58 nm), (all P values <0.05, respectively). Patients with medium SI showed the lowest ocular surface disease index (OSDI) value (26.64±1.06), the longest FBUT (4.56±0.08 s), and the thickest lipid layer (80.20±2.90 nm). After treatment, the high SI values reduced significantly at each follow-up point compared to baseline (all P values <0.05). The medium SI group demonstrated the greatest improvement in symptoms and signs, followed by the high SI group, and the low SI group. Conclusions: Automated measurements of SI can effectively reflect MG secretory activity. The proposed low, medium, and high SI classifications represent different functional subtypes of MGD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.