Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144054›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Meibography signal intensity as a novel image biomarker for meibomian gland function: evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

Yuqing Deng, Lirong Ling, Zhongzhou Luo, Ruiwen Xu, Yimin Zhang, Kang Yu, Jijing Li, Tingting Zhang, Xiaoqing Hu, Peng Xiao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuqing DengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Lirong LingState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhongzhou LuoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ruiwen XuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yimin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Kang YuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jijing LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Tingting ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoqing HuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Peng XiaoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jin YuanState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), one of the most common ocular surface diseases, can induce dry eye and reduce patients' quality of life. Methodological limitations have resulted in contradictory interpretations of gland function. This study sought to investigate the correlation between meibography signal intensity (SI) and meibomian gland (MG) function and to validate an MGD classification strategy based on different levels of SI. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 817 eyes from 361 patients with MGD and 52 healthy controls. Additionally, 78 eyes from 39 patients with MGD who had undergone LipiFlow treatment were recruited for longitudinal analyses. The SI value was obtained via meibography using an automated analyzer, and all participants underwent ocular surface examinations. A cross-sectional analysis was performed to determine SI distribution and its relationship to clinical characteristics via a generalized estimating equation model. Longitudinal analyses were conducted on the treatment cohort using a mixed-effects model to explore the outcome in different SI levels. Results: Regression analysis revealed significant correlations between SI and lipid layer thickness (β=0.016), meibum expressibility (β=-0.676), meibum quality (β=-0.251), and fluorescein-stained tear-film break-up time (FBUT) (β=0.064) (all P values <0.001 for the above associations). Low-level SI MGD cases exhibited the most severe clinical signs, including the worst meibum expressibility (16% for level 3) and quality scores (19% for level 3), the shortest FBUT (3.82±0.13 s), and the thinnest lipid layer (65.68±2.58 nm), (all P values <0.05, respectively). Patients with medium SI showed the lowest ocular surface disease index (OSDI) value (26.64±1.06), the longest FBUT (4.56±0.08 s), and the thickest lipid layer (80.20±2.90 nm). After treatment, the high SI values reduced significantly at each follow-up point compared to baseline (all P values <0.05). The medium SI group demonstrated the greatest improvement in symptoms and signs, followed by the high SI group, and the low SI group. Conclusions: Automated measurements of SI can effectively reflect MG secretory activity. The proposed low, medium, and high SI classifications represent different functional subtypes of MGD.

Indexed as

image biomarkermeibographyMeibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)signal intensity (SI)

Identifiers

PMID39144054
PMCPMC11320511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.