ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
A magnetic resonance imaging-based lymph node regression grading scheme for nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The application of grayscale quantitative analysis in the differential diagnosis of necrosis between cervical lymph node metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and tuberculous lymphadenitis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an MRI radiomics-based interpretable machine learning model for predicting the progression-free survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), there is no established method to distinguish between patients with residual disease that may eventually progress and those who have achieved cured. We thus aimed to assess the prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based lymph node regression grade (LRG) in the risk stratification of patients with NPC following radiotherapy (RT). Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled 387 patients newly diagnosed with NPC between January 2010 and January 2013. A four-category MRI-LRG system based on the areal analysis of RT-induced fibrosis and residual tumor was established. Univariate analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were conducted via the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were conducted using Cox regression models to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and adjusted P values. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: The sum of MRI-LRG scores (LRG-sum) was an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 2.50, 95% CI: 1.28-4.90; P<0.001). LRG-sum ≤9 and >9 showed a poorer 5-year PFS rate than did LRG-sum ≤2 (66.1%, 42.9%, and 77.6%, respectively; P<0.001). A survival clustering analysis-based decision tree model showed more complex interactions among LRG-sum and pretreatment and post-RT Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA, yielding four patient clusters with differentiated disease progression risks (5-year PFS rates of 89.5%, 76.4%, 57.6%, and 27.8%, respectively), which showed better risk stratification than did post-RT EBV DNA alone (P<0.001). Conclusions: The MRI-LRG system adds prognostic information and is a potentially reliable, noninvasive means to stratify treatment modalities for patients with NPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.