ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Repeatability and reproducibility of deep learning features for lung adenocarcinoma subtypes with nodules less than 10 mm in size: a multicenter thin-slice computed tomography phantom and clinical validation study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A radiomics-based machine learning model for the preoperative differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma subtypes.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- A deep learning-clinical combined model with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method for assessing the tumor spread through air spaces in lung adenocarcinoma: a multicohort retrospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Reproducibility of the CT radiomic features of pulmonary nodules: the effects of the CT reconstruction algorithm, radiation dose, and contrast agent.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Deep learning features (DLFs) derived from radiomics features (RFs) fused with deep learning have shown potential in enhancing diagnostic capability. However, the limited repeatability and reproducibility of DLFs across multiple centers represents a challenge in the clinically validation of these features. This study thus aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of DLFs and their potential efficiency in differentiating subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma less than 10 mm in size and manifesting as ground-glass nodules (GGNs). Methods: A chest phantom with nodules was scanned repeatedly using different thin-slice computed tomography (TSCT) scanners with varying acquisition and reconstruction parameters. The robustness of the DLFs was measured using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A deep learning approach was used for visualizing the DLFs. To assess the clinical effectiveness and generalizability of the stable and informative DLFs, three hospitals were used to source 275 patients, in whom 405 nodules were pathologically differentially diagnosed as GGN lung adenocarcinoma less than 10 mm in size and were retrospectively reviewed for clinical validation. Results: A total of 64 DLFs were analyzed, which revealed that the variables of slice thickness and slice interval (ICC, 0.79±0.18) and reconstruction kernel (ICC, 0.82±0.07) were significantly associated with the robustness of DLFs. Feature visualization showed that the DLFs were mainly focused around the nodule areas. In the external validation, a subset of 28 robust DLFs identified as stable under all sources of variability achieved the highest area under curve [AUC =0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.76] compared to other DLF models and the radiomics model. Conclusions: Although different manufacturers and scanning schemes affect the reproducibility of DLFs, certain DLFs demonstrated excellent stability and effectively improved diagnostic the efficacy for identifying subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma. Therefore, as the first step, screening stable DLFs in multicenter DLFs research may improve diagnostic efficacy and promote the application of these features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.