ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Deep learning models for rapid discrimination of high-grade gliomas from solitary brain metastases using multi-plane T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1CE) images.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physio-metabolic MRI of oxygen metabolism and neovascularization for differentiating glioblastomas from solitary NSCLC brain metastases.La Radiologia medica · 2026Observational
- Identification of intrinsic imaging subtypes using clustering analysis based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging radiomics features for gliomas: preliminary associations with gene expression profiles.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Modernizing Neuro-Oncology: The Impact of Imaging, Liquid Biopsies, and AI on Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in the task of segmentation and classification of brain metastases images: current challenges and future opportunities.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Bi-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating high-grade gliomas from solitary brain metastases: a VOI-based histogram analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A literature review of artificial intelligence (AI) for medical image segmentation: from AI and explainable AI to trustworthy AI.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High-grade gliomas (HGG) and solitary brain metastases (SBM) are two common types of brain tumors in middle-aged and elderly patients. HGG and SBM display a high degree of similarity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. Consequently, differential diagnosis using preoperative MRI remains challenging. This study developed deep learning models that used pre-operative T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1CE) MRI images to differentiate between HGG and SBM before surgery. Methods: By comparing various convolutional neural network models using T1CE image data from The First Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital and The Second People's Hospital of Yibin (Data collection for this study spanned from January 2016 to December 2023), it was confirmed that the GoogLeNet model exhibited the highest discriminative performance. Additionally, we evaluated the individual impact of the tumoral core and peritumoral edema regions on the network's predictive performance. Finally, we adopted a slice-based voting method to assess the accuracy of the validation dataset and evaluated patient prediction performance on an additional test dataset. Results: The GoogLeNet model, in a five-fold cross-validation using multi-plane T1CE slices (axial, coronal, and sagittal) from 180 patients, achieved an average patient accuracy of 92.78%, a sensitivity of 95.56%, and a specificity of 90.00%. Moreover, on an external test set of 29 patients, the model achieved an accuracy of 89.66%, a sensitivity of 90.91%, and a specificity of 83.33%, with an area under the curve of 0.939 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.842-1.000]. Conclusions: GoogLeNet performed better than previous methods at differentiating HGG from SBM, even for core and peritumoral edema in both. HGG and SBM could be fast screened using this end-to-end approach, improving workflow for both tumor treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.