ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Deep learning-based quantitative morphological study of anteroposterior digital radiographs of the lumbar spine.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphological characteristics of lumbar vertebral bodies and regional distribution patterns of bone mineral density: a CT study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Lumbar region perception segmentation: a novel algorithm for automated vertebral motion parameter measurement.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Morphological parameters of the lumbar spine are valuable in assessing lumbar spine diseases. However, manual measurement of lumbar morphological parameters is time-consuming. Deep learning has automatic quantitative and qualitative analysis capabilities. To develop a deep learning-based model for the automatic quantitative measurement of morphological parameters from anteroposterior digital radiographs of the lumbar spine and to evaluate its performance. Methods: This study used 1,368 anteroposterior digital radiographs of the lumbar spine to train a deep learning model to measure the quantitative morphological indicators, including L1 to L5 vertebral body height (VBH) and L1-L2 to L4-L5 intervertebral disc height (IDH). The means of the manual measurements by three radiologists were used as the reference standard. The parameters predicted by the model were analyzed against the manual measurements using paired Results: Within the 3-mm distance threshold, the model had a PCK range of 99.77-99.46% for the L1 to L4 vertebrae and 77.37% for the L5 vertebrae. Except for VBH-L5 and IDH_L3-L4, IDH_L4-L5 (P<0.05), the estimated values of the model in the remaining parameters were not statistically significant compared with the reference standard (P>0.05). Except for VBH-L5 and IDH_L4-L5, the model showed good correlation and consistency with the reference standard (ICC =0.84-0.96, r=0.85-0.97, MAE =0.5-0.66, RMSE =0.66-0.95). The model outperformed other models (EfficientDet + Unet, EfficientDet + DarkPose, HRNet, and Unet) in predicting landmarks within a distance threshold of 1.5 to 5 mm. Conclusions: The model developed in this study can automatically measure the morphological parameters of the L1 to L4 vertebrae from anteroposterior digital radiographs of the lumbar spine. Its performance is close to the level of radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.