ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Fully automated classification of pulmonary nodules in positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging using a two-stage multimodal learning approach.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Automated diagnosis of pulmonary nodules in 3D PET/CT images using dual-path densely connected networks with cross-modal fusion.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- A two-stage multimodal learning framework for the automated diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease based on dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Comprehensive review of pulmonary embolism imaging: past, present and future innovations in computed tomography (CT) and other diagnostic techniques.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is a malignant tumor, for which pulmonary nodules are considered to be significant indicators. Early recognition and timely treatment of pulmonary nodules can contribute to improving the survival rate of patients with cancer. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) is a noninvasive, fusion imaging technique that can obtain both functional and structural information of lung regions. However, studies of pulmonary nodules based on computer-aided diagnosis have primarily focused on the nodule level due to a reliance on the annotation of nodules, which is superficial and unable to contribute to the actual clinical diagnosis. The aim of this study was thus to develop a fully automated classification framework for a more comprehensive assessment of pulmonary nodules in PET/CT imaging data. Methods: We developed a two-stage multimodal learning framework for the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules in PET/CT imaging. In this framework, Stage I focuses on pulmonary parenchyma segmentation using a pretrained U-Net and PET/CT registration. Stage II aims to extract, integrate, and recognize image-level and feature-level features by employing the three-dimensional (3D) Inception-residual net (ResNet) convolutional block attention module architecture and a dense-voting fusion mechanism. Results: In the experiments, the proposed model's performance was comprehensively validated using a set of real clinical data, achieving mean scores of 89.98%, 89.21%, 84.75%, 93.38%, 86.83%, and 0.9227 for accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, F1 score, and area under curve values, respectively. Conclusions: This paper presents a two-stage multimodal learning approach for the automatic diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. The findings reveal that the main reason for limiting model performance is the nonsolitary property of nodules in pulmonary nodule diagnosis, providing direction for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.