Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39144013›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Diagnostic efficacy of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound thyroid imaging reporting and data system classification for benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Yu-Ping Yang, Guo-Li Zhang, Hong-Lian Zhou, Hai-Xia Dai, Xing Huang, Li-Juan Liu, Jun Xie, Jie-Xin Wang, Hua-Juan Li, Xin Liang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yu-Ping Yang *Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9889-8389
Guo-Li Zhang *Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Hong-Lian ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Hai-Xia DaiDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Xing HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Li-Juan LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Jun XieDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Jie-Xin WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Hua-Juan LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Xin LiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Qian YuanDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Yan-Hao ZengDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Xiao-Hong XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The contrasted-enhanced ultrasound thyroid imaging reporting and data system (CEUS TI-RADS) is the first international risk stratification system for thyroid nodules based on conventional ultrasound (US) and CEUS. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS TI-RADS for benign and malignant thyroid nodules and to assess the related interobserver agreement. Methods: The study recruited 433 patients who underwent thyroid US and CEUS between January 2019 and June 2023 at the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University. A retrospective analysis of 467 thyroid nodules confirmed by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and/or surgery was performed. Further, a CEUS TI-RADS classification was assigned to each thyroid nodule based on the CEUS TI-RADS scoring criteria for the US and CEUS features of the nodule. The nodules were grouped based on their sizes as follows: size ≤1 cm, group A; size >1 and ≤4 cm, group B; and size >4 cm, group C. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze independent risk factors for malignant thyroid nodules. Pathological assessment was the reference standard for establishing the sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), accuracy (ACC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of CEUS TI-RADS in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules. The area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the scoring system in predicting malignancy in three groups of nodules. The intragroup correlation coefficient (ICC) was adopted to assess the interobserver agreement of the CEUS TI-RADS score. Results: Out of the 467 thyroid nodules, 262 were malignant and 205 were benign. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the independent risk factors for malignant thyroid nodules included punctate echogenic foci (P<0.001), taller-than-wide shape (P=0.015), extrathyroidal invasion (P=0.020), irregular margins/lobulation (P=0.036), hypoechoicity on US (P=0.038), and hypoenhancement on CEUS (P<0.001). The AUC for the CEUS TI-RADS in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules was 0.898 for all nodules, 0.795 for group A, 0.949 for group B, and 0.801 for group C, with the optimal cutoff values of the CEUS TI-RADS being 5 points, 6 points, 5 points, and 5 points, respectively. Among these groups of nodules, group B had the highest AUC, with the SEN, SPE, ACC, PPV, and NPV for diagnosing malignant nodules being 95.9%, 88.1%, 92.8%, 92.6%, and 93.2%, respectively. The ICC of the CEUS TI-RADS classification between senior and junior physicians was 0.862 (P<0.001). Conclusions: In summary, CEUS TI-RADS demonstrated significant efficacy in distinguishing thyroid nodules. Nonetheless, there were variations in its capacity to detect malignant nodules across diverse sizes, and it demonstrate optimal performance in 1- to 4-cm nodules. These findings may serve as important insights for clinical diagnoses.

Indexed as

contrasted-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)Contrasted-enhanced ultrasound thyroid imaging reporting and data system (CEUS TI-RADS)malignancythyroid nodulesultrasound (US)

Identifiers

PMID39144013
PMCPMC11320530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.