Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143901›Full record

ArticleAdvances in physiology education2024

General skills amidst the details: alternative learning objectives and a framework of competencies for human anatomy.

Gregory J Crowther, Victoria L VanHeel, Sasha D Gradwell, Casey J Self, Krista L Rompolski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in physiology education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gregory J CrowtherLife Sciences Department, Everett Community College, Everett, Washington, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0530-9130
Victoria L VanHeelLife Sciences Department, Everett Community College, Everett, Washington, United States.
Sasha D GradwellLife Sciences Department, Everett Community College, Everett, Washington, United States.
Casey J SelfDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-7832-9146
Krista L RompolskiSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Moravian University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9309-3389

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 1624200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of anatomy is often seen by nonanatomists as concerned primarily with the tasks of locating, naming, and describing structures; these tasks, in turn, are often assumed to require only lower-order cognitive skills (LOCSs), i.e., the Knowledge or Comprehension levels of Bloom's taxonomy. Many nonanatomists may thus believe that studying anatomy does not develop transferable higher-order cognitive skills. Published lists of anatomy learning objectives (LOs) might reinforce this view by focusing attention on numerous details of specific structures and regions. To explore this issue further, we have analyzed the structure of published peer-reviewed LOs by characterizing their organization (single-tiered or multi-tiered), inclusion of function, use of action verbs, and dependence on or independence of context. Our results suggest that previously published LO lists, despite their value, may not fully showcase opportunities for students to develop higher-order skills. In the hope of stimulating further discussion and scholarship, we present here a two-tiered framework of human anatomy competencies, i.e., generalizable skills beyond straightforward recognition and memorization. This framework, which is intended to be both student-facing and faculty-facing, illustrates how anatomy courses may be reframed as opportunities to think critically and develop sophisticated, professionally relevant skills.

Indexed as

AnatomyLearningComprehensionCurriculumHumanshigher-order cognitive skillsinstructional objectivelearning outcometransfer

Identifiers

PMID39143901
PMCPMC11684873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.