ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2024
Changes in perfusion and permeability in glioblastoma model induced by the anti-angiogenic agents cediranib and thalidomide.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploration of M2 macrophage-related biomarkers and a candidate drug for glioblastoma using high-dimensional weighted gene co-expression network analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe poor delivery of drugs to infiltrating tumor cells contributes to therapeutic failure in glioblastoma. During the early phase of an anti-angiogenic treatment, a remodeling of the tumor vasculature could occur, leading to a more functional vessel network that could enhance drug delivery. However, the restructuration of blood vessels could increase the proportion of normal endothelial cells that could be a barrier for the free diffusion of drugs. The net balance, in favor or not, of a better delivery of compounds during the course of an antiangiogenic treatment remains to be established. This study explored whether cediranib and thalidomide could modulate perfusion and vessel permeability in the brain U87 tumor mouse model.
methodsThe dynamic evolution of the diffusion of agents outside the tumor core using the fluorescent dye Evans Blue in histology and Gd-DOTA using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI. CD31 labelling of endothelial cells was used to measure the vascular density. RESULTS AND
interpretationCediranib and thalidomide effectively reduced tumor size over time. The accessibility of Evans Blue outside the tumor core continuously decreased over time. The vascular density was significantly decreased after treatment while the proportion of normal vessels remained unchanged over time. In contrast to histological studies, DCE-MRI did not tackle any significant change in hemodynamic parameters, in the core or margins of the tumor, whatever the parameter used or the pharmacokinetic model used. While cediranib and thalidomide were effective in decreasing the tumor size, they were ineffective in transiently increasing the delivery of agents in the core and the margins of the tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.