ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2024
Biodistribution of cerium dioxide and titanium dioxide nanomaterials in rats after single and repeated inhalation exposures.
Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From bench to bedside: Overcoming translational hurdles in nanoparticle research with pharmacokinetic modeling.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- Nanomaterials reshaping cancer radiotherapy: Radiosensitization mechanisms, delivery and theranostic platforms, multimodal synergy, and clinical translation strategies.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- The Pneumoconiosis Renaissance: Revisiting the Pulmonary Pathology of Poorly Soluble Low Toxicity Particles: Insights from Rodent Inhalation Studies on Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Modulatory effects of CeOParticle and fibre toxicology · 2026Article
- Targeting Inflammation-Oxidative Stress Crosstalk: Advances and Challenges in Nanocarrier-Based Interventional Strategies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Environmental exposure to rare earth elements and respiratory health: an emerging public health concern.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhysiologically based kinetic models facilitate the safety assessment of inhaled engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). To develop these models, high quality datasets on well-characterized ENMs are needed. However, there are at present, several data gaps in the systemic availability of poorly soluble particles after inhalation. The aim of the present study was therefore to acquire two comparable datasets to parametrize a physiologically-based kinetic model.
methodRats were exposed to cerium dioxide (CeO
resultsAlthough similar lung deposited doses were obtained for both materials, exposure to CeO
conclusionWe have provided insight in the distribution kinetics of these two ENMs based on experimental data and modelling. The study design allows extrapolation at different dose-levels and study durations. Despite equal dose levels of both ENMs, we observed different distribution patterns, that, in part may be explained by subtle differences in biological responses in the lung.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.