ArticleBMC medical genomics2024
Revealing differential expression patterns of piRNA in FACS blood cells of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic mechanisms of retroviral regulation: a comparative review.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2026Review
- Changes in the Repertoire of tRNA-Derived Fragments in Different Blood Cell Populations.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-coding RNA expression has shown to have cell type-specificity. The regulatory characteristics of these molecules are impacted by changes in their expression levels. We performed next-generation sequencing and examined small RNA-seq data obtained from 6 different types of blood cells separated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting of severe COVID-19 patients and healthy control donors. In addition to examining the behavior of piRNA in the blood cells of severe SARS-CoV-2 infected patients, our aim was to present a distinct piRNA differential expression portrait for each separate cell type. We observed that depending on the type of cell, different sorted control cells (erythrocytes, monocytes, lymphocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and neutrophils) have altering piRNA expression patterns. After analyzing the expression of piRNAs in each set of sorted cells from patients with severe COVID-19, we observed 3 significantly elevated piRNAs - piR-33,123, piR-34,765, piR-43,768 and 9 downregulated piRNAs in erythrocytes. In lymphocytes, all 19 piRNAs were upregulated. Monocytes were presented with a larger amount of statistically significant piRNA, 5 upregulated (piR-49039 piR-31623, piR-37213, piR-44721, piR-44720) and 35 downregulated. It has been previously shown that piR-31,623 has been associated with respiratory syncytial virus infection, and taking in account the major role of piRNA in transposon silencing, we presume that the differential expression patterns which we observed could be a signal of indirect antiviral activity or a specific antiviral cell state. Additionally, in lymphocytes, all 19 piRNAs were upregulated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.