Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143527›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Midterm complications after primary obstetrical anal sphincter injury repair in France.

Marine Lallemant, Stéphanie Bartolo, Louise Ghesquiere, Chrystèle Rubod, Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo, Yohan Kerbage, Emmanuel Chazard, Michel Cosson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marine LallemantService de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Lille, Lille, F-59000, France. marine.lallemant@chu-lille.fr.
Stéphanie BartoloPublic health dept, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS, CERIM, Lille, F-59000, France.
Louise GhesquiereService de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Lille, Lille, F-59000, France.
Chrystèle RubodService de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Lille, Lille, F-59000, France.
Alessandro Ferdinando RuffoloService de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Lille, Lille, F-59000, France.
Yohan KerbageService de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Lille, Lille, F-59000, France.
Emmanuel ChazardPublic health dept, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS, CERIM, Lille, F-59000, France.
Michel CossonService de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Lille, Lille, F-59000, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncidence of complications following obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASI) during vaginal delivery are poorly defined. They are only studied in high level maternities, small cohorts, all stages of perineal tear or in low-income countries. The aim of our study was to describe complications after primary OASI repair following a vaginal delivery in all French maternity wards at short and midterm and to assess factors associated with complication occurrence.

methodsWe conducted a historical cohort study using the French nationwide claim database (PMSI) from January 2013 to December 2021. All women who sustained an OASI repair following a vaginal delivery were included and virtually followed-up for 2 years. Then, we searched for OASIS complications. Finally, we evaluated factors associated with OASIS complication repaired or not and OASIS complication repairs.

resultsAmong the 61,833 included women, 2015 (2.8%) had an OASI complication and 842 (1.16%) underwent an OASI complication repair. Women were mainly primiparous (71.6%) and 44.3% underwent an instrumental delivery. During a follow-up of 2 years, 0.6% (n = 463), 0.3% (n = 240), 0.2% (n = 176), 0.1% (n = 84), 0.06% (n = 43) and 0.01% (n = 5) of patients underwent second surgery for a perineal repair, a fistula repair, a sphincteroplasty, a perineal infection, a colostomy and a sacral nervous anal stimulation, respectively. Only one case of artificial anal sphincter was noticed. Instrumental deliveries (OR = 1.56 CI95%[1.29;1.9]), private for-profit hospitals (OR = 1.42 [1.11;1.82], reference group "public hospital"), obesity (OR = 1.36 [1;1.84]), stage IV OASIS (OR = 2.98 [2.4;3.72]), perineal wound breakdown (OR = 2.8 [1.4;5.48]), ages between 25 and 29 years old (OR = 1.59 [1.17;2.18], refence group "age between 13 and 24 years old") and 30 and 34 years old (OR = 1.57 [1.14; 2.16], refence group "age between 13 and 24 years old") were factors associated with OASIS complication repairs.

conclusionsMaternal age, stage IV OASIS, obesity, instrumental deliveries and private for-profit hospitals seemed to predict OASIS complications. Understanding factors associated with OASIS complications could be beneficial for the patient to inform them and to influence the patient's follow-up in order to prevent complications, repairs and maternal distress.

Indexed as

Anal CanalDelivery, ObstetricObstetric Labor ComplicationsAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansIncidenceLacerationsPerineumPostoperative ComplicationsPregnancyRisk FactorsYoung AdultAnal sphincter repairPerineal carePerineal traumaWound breakdownWound complicationWound infection

Identifiers

PMID39143527
PMCPMC11325760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.