ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024
Clinical observations of EVO-ICL implantation with single incision without viscoelastic agent.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delayed uveitis after implantable Collamer lens Implantation caused by COVID-19 infection: a case report.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the safety and effectiveness of non-viscoelastic agent technique for EVO-ICL implantation.
methodsA total of 181 myopia eyes that underwent non-toric ICL without viscoelastic agent through single incision from Beijing Tongren Hosipital were included. An analysis was conducted on the quantity of haptics that were initially implanted intraoperatively into the posterior chamber. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was evaluated at before and 2 h,24 h,1week,6month after surgery. Anterior chamber volume(ACV), anterior chamber depth(ACD), anterior chamber angle(ACA), pupil diameter(PD) and corneal densitometry density (ECD) were evaluated at before and 24 h postoperatively. Refractive outcomes were investigated at before, 24 h ,7 days and 6months. Vault was evaluated at 24 h ,7 days and 6months.
resultsThe efficacy and safety indices were 1.30 ± 0.32 and 1.31 ± 0.32, respectively. Of 181 eyes, 99 eyes received 4 haptics on the first attempt without any adjustment, and 72 eyes received lens alignment without an viscoelastic agent. The success rate of the viscoelastic agent free procedure was 94.5%. Two hours postoperatively, IOP was 17.41 ± 3.77 mmHg, which was significantly higher than baseline value (t = 8.930, P < 0.000), however there was no significant difference between preoperative IOP and IOP at 1 day ,1 week and 6 months postoperatively. The ECD changed from 2895.52 ± 253.73 cells/mm2 preoperatively to 2873.66 ± 244.17 cells/mm2 at 1 day and 2882.63 ± 239.97 postoperatively, and the difference was not statistically significant (t = 1.811, P = 0.072). The ACA was narrowed by 42% on the first day.
conclusionThe pure viscoelastic agent free technique is an efficient and safe way for ICL implantation. It can be a safer method of ICL implantation because of it reduces the risk of complications associated with ocular hypertension at the early postoperative stages.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000036335) at August 20, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.