Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143488›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

Factors influencing nurse practitioner panel size in team-based primary care: a qualitative case study.

Ruth Martin-Misener, Faith Donald, Jennifer Rayner, Nancy Carter, Kelley Kilpatrick, Erin Ziegler, Ivy Bourgeault, Denise Bryant-Lukosius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Staff Experiences with the Implementation of Nurse Practitioner (NP)-led Clinics in New Brunswick, Canada.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruth Martin-MisenerSchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, 5869 University Ave, Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada. ruth.martin-misener@dal.ca.
Faith DonaldDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Toronto Metropolitan University (formerly Ryerson University), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jennifer RaynerAlliance for Heathier Communities, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nancy CarterSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Kelley KilpatrickIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Erin ZieglerDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Toronto Metropolitan University (formerly Ryerson University), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ivy BourgeaultSchool of Sociological and Anthropological Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Denise Bryant-LukosiusSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care 06695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLack of access to health care is a worldwide public health crisis. In primary care it has led to increases in the implementation of nurse practitioners and heightened interest in their patient panel capacity. The aim of this study was to examine factors influencing nurse practitioner patient panel size in team-based primary care in Ontario, Canada.

methodsWe used a multiple case study design. Eight team-based primary care practices including rural and urban settings were purposively selected as cases. Each case had two or more nurse practitioners with a minimum of two years experience in the primary care setting. Interviews were conducted in-person, audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using content analysis.

resultsForty participants, including 19 nurse practitioners, 16 administrators (inclusive of executives, managers, and receptionists), and 5 physicians were interviewed. Patient, provider, organizational, and system factors influenced nurse practitioner patient panel size. There were eight sub-factors: complexity of patients' health and social needs; holistic nursing model of care; nurse practitioner experience and confidence; composition and functioning of the multidisciplinary team; clerical and administrative supports, and nurse practitioner activities and expectations. All participants found it difficult to identify the panel size of nurse practitioners, calling it- "a grey area." Establishing and maintaining a longitudinal relationship that responded holistically to patients' needs was fundamental to how nurse practitioners provided care. Social factors such as gender, poverty, mental health concerns, historical trauma, marginalisation and literacy contributed to the complexity of patients' needs. Participants indicated NPs tried to address all of a patient's concerns at each visit.

conclusionsNurse practitioners have a holistic approach that incorporates attention to the social determinants of health as well as acute and chronic comorbidities. This approach compels them to try to address all of the needs a patient is experiencing at each visit and reduces their panel size. Multidisciplinary teams have an opportunity to be deliberate when structuring their services across providers to meet more of the health and social needs of empanelled patients. This could enable increases in nurse practitioner panel size.

Indexed as

Nurse PractitionersPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioCase studyNurse practitionerPanel sizePrimary careSocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID39143488
PMCPMC11323452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.