Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143461›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2024

Myocardial strain is regulated by cardiac preload in the early stage of sepsis.

Xiaolong Huang, Guiyang Lu, Xiaoyang Cai, Yingchang Xue, Xinxin Wang, Yuanyuan Jiang, Yaogui Ning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaolong Huang *Department of Intensive Care Unit, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Guiyang Lu *Department of Intensive Care Unit, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Xiaoyang Cai *Department of Intensive Care Unit, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yingchang Xue *Department of Intensive Care Unit, People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xinxin WangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yuanyuan JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yaogui NingDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China. nyg@xmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOwing to a lack of data, this study aimed to explore the effect of cardiac preload on myocardial strain in patients with sepsis.

methodsA total of 70 patients with sepsis in intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary teaching hospital in China from January 2018 to July 2019 and underwent transthoracic echocardiography were enrolled. Echocardiographic data were recorded at ICU admission and 24 h later. Patients were assigned to low left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) and normal LVEDVI groups. We assessed the impact of preload on myocardial strain between the groups and analyzed the correlation of echocardiographic parameters under different preload conditions.

resultsThirty-seven patients (53%) had a low LVEDVI and 33 (47%) a normal LVEDVI. Those in the low LVEDVI group had a faster heart rate (121.7 vs. 95.3, p < 0.001) and required a greater degree of fluid infusion (3.67 L vs. 2.62 L, P = 0.019). The left ventricular global strain (LVGLS) (-8.60% vs. -10.80%, p = 0.001), left ventricular global circumferential strain (LVGCS) (-13.83% vs. -18.26%, p = 0.006), and right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) (-6.9% vs. -10.60%, p = 0.001) showed significant improvements in the low LVEDVI group after fluid resuscitation. However, fluid resuscitation resulted in a significantly increased cardiac afterload value (1172.00 vs. 1487.00, p = 0.009) only in the normal LVEDVI group. Multivariate backward linear regression showed that LVEDVI changes were independently associated with myocardial strain-related improvements during fluid resuscitation. The baseline LVEDVI was significantly negatively correlated with the LVGLS and RVGLS (r = -0.44 and - 0.39, respectively) but not LVGCS. LVEDVI increases during fluid resuscitation were associated with improvements in the myocardial strain degree.

conclusionsMyocardial strain alterations were significantly influenced by the cardiac preload during fluid resuscitation in sepsis.

Indexed as

SepsisVentricular Function, LeftAgedChinaEchocardiographyFemaleFluid TherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial ContractionPredictive Value of TestsStroke VolumeTime FactorsVentricular Dysfunction, LeftCardiac preloadEchocardiographySepsisStrain

Identifiers

PMID39143461
PMCPMC11323523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.