Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143448›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2024

Living with faecal incontinence: a qualitative investigation of patient experiences and preferred outcomes through semi-structured interviews.

S L Assmann, D Keszthelyi, S O Breukink, M L Kimman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of obstetric and non-obstetric anal sphincter injuries: Surgical outcomes and Jorge Wexner score analysis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S L AssmannDepartment of Surgery and Colorectal Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. s.assmann@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8740-7916
D KeszthelyiDepartment of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-9980
S O BreukinkDepartment of Surgery and Colorectal Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5445-4011
M L KimmanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Care and Public Health, Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5717-5704

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFaecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent and debilitating anorectal problem causing embarrassment, anxiety, and social isolation, diminishing quality of life. At present there is no optimal treatment option for FI. Consequently, treatments primarily focus on symptom reduction and improving quality of life. Understanding patient experiences and outcomes they seek from treatment is crucial for improving care. This study aims to explore how FI impacts patients' lives and identify important treatment outcomes as part of the development of a Core Outcome Set (COS).

methodsPatients with FI were recruited from outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. Semi-structured interviews were performed, audio recorded, transcribed per verbatim and coded. Thematic analysis was performed to identify (sub)themes and categories relevant to the patients.

resultsTwelve interviews were conducted before saturation was reached (75% female, 25% male, mean age 63, range 39-83 year). Four main themes emerged 'Physical symptoms', 'Impact on daily life', 'Emotional impact' and 'Coping'. Patients expressed how FI severely limits daily activities and emotional wellbeing. Treatment priorities centred on resuming normal activities rather than solely on symptom reduction.

conclusionThe impact of FI extends far beyond uncontrolled loss of faeces, affecting psychological, emotional, and social wellbeing. Patients prioritise outcomes focussed on reclaiming normalcy and independence rather than focusing on physical symptoms alone. Integrating these patient-centered outcomes in future studies could enhance treatment satisfaction and patient-perceived treatment success. Furthermore, the outcomes identified in this study can be included in a Delphi survey alongside other relevant outcomes, paving the way for the development of a COS.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalFecal IncontinenceInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsFaecal incontinenceQualitative researchQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID39143448
PMCPMC11541390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.