Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143425›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024

Intraoperative computerised tomography scan for percutaneous fixation of the pelvis: a retrospective case series.

Monahan Kevin, Hogan William, Matthew Chilton, Maher Michael, Hughes Alice, Altman Gregory, Altman Daniel, Hammarstedt Jon Erik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical impact of early postoperative routine radiology in isolated pelvic injuries: a retrospective study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Monahan KevinAllegheny General Hospital, 320 E North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15201, USA.
Hogan WilliamAllegheny General Hospital, 320 E North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15201, USA.
Matthew ChiltonAllegheny General Hospital, 320 E North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15201, USA. mattchilton1@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1308-2290
Maher MichaelAllegheny General Hospital, 320 E North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15201, USA.
Hughes AliceAllegheny General Hospital, 320 E North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15201, USA.
Altman GregoryAllegheny General Hospital, 320 E North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15201, USA.
Altman DanielAllegheny General Hospital, 320 E North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15201, USA.
Hammarstedt Jon ErikAllegheny General Hospital, 320 E North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15201, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFractures and dislocations of the pelvic ring are complex injuries that when treating require meticulous attention to detail and often specialized technical skill. These injuries can be the result of high-energy trauma, particularly in younger patients, or low energy trauma more often found in the elderly. Regardless of mechanism, these injuries lie on a spectrum of severity and can be treated conservatively or surgically. Percutaneous fixation under fluoroscopic guidance is the preferred standard technique when treating these fractures. This technique can be challenging for a variety of reasons including patient characteristics, intra-operative image quality, fracture morphology, among others.

methodsThis retrospective study evaluated the use of intra-operative computed tomography (CT) using an O-arm imaging system for critical evaluation of fluoroscopic-guided screw placement in twenty-three patients. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of patients who were treated by three fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists during a one-year span. Patients undergoing percutaneous pelvis fixation using both standard fluoroscopy and intraoperative CT with the Medtronic O-arm® (Minneapolis, MN) imaging system. Additionally, procedures performed included open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the pelvic ring, acetabulum, and associated extremity fractures.

resultsTwenty-three patients were included in this study. On average, the use of intraoperative CT added 24.4 min in operative time. Five patients (21.7%) required implant adjustment after O-arm spin. Fourteen patients underwent additional post-operative CT. No secondary revision surgeries were attempted after any post-operative CT.

conclusionsOur study suggests that intra-operative CT scan, compared to post-operative CT scan, can be utilized to prevent take-back surgery for misplaced implants and allow for adjustment in real-time.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BonePelvic BonesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone ScrewsFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurgery, Computer-AssistedYoung AdultCT scanFluoroscopyIntra-operativeO-armPelvisRevision

Identifiers

PMID39143425
PMCPMC11422416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.