Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143386›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2024

Development of deep learning-based novel auto-segmentation for the prostatic urethra on planning CT images for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Hisamichi Takagi, Ken Takeda, Noriyuki Kadoya, Koki Inoue, Shiki Endo, Noriyoshi Takahashi, Takaya Yamamoto, Rei Umezawa, Keiichi Jingu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hisamichi TakagiCourse of Radiological Technology, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan. h.takagi@med.tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2389-2577
Ken TakedaCourse of Radiological Technology, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan.
Noriyuki KadoyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Koki InoueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Shiki EndoCourse of Radiological Technology, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan.
Noriyoshi TakahashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Takaya YamamotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Rei UmezawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Keiichi JinguDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 22K20812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary toxicities are one of the serious complications of radiotherapy for prostate cancer, and dose-volume histogram of prostatic urethra has been associated with such toxicities in previous reports. Previous research has focused on estimating the prostatic urethra, which is difficult to delineate in CT images; however, these studies, which are limited in number, mainly focused on cases undergoing brachytherapy uses low-dose-rate sources and do not involve external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). In this study, we aimed to develop a deep learning-based method of determining the position of the prostatic urethra in patients eligible for EBRT. We used contour data from 430 patients with localized prostate cancer. In all cases, a urethral catheter was placed when planning CT to identify the prostatic urethra. We used 2D and 3D U-Net segmentation models. The input images included the bladder and prostate, while the output images focused on the prostatic urethra. The 2D model determined the prostate's position based on results from both coronal and sagittal directions. Evaluation metrics included the average distance between centerlines. The average centerline distances for the 2D and 3D models were 2.07 ± 0.87 mm and 2.05 ± 0.92 mm, respectively. Increasing the number of cases while maintaining equivalent accuracy as we did in this study suggests the potential for high generalization performance and the feasibility of using deep learning technology for estimating the position of the prostatic urethra.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedUrethraHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleCT imageDeep learning technologyProstate cancerProstatic urethraUrinary toxicity

Identifiers

PMID39143386
PMCPMC11579160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.