ArticleJournal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection2024
Role of paranasal abnormalities and systemic inflammation on primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Article in Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Structure to Aesthetics: The Importance of Nasal Bone Thickness in Rhinoplasty Planning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Reduced Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio in Chronic Dacryocystitis: A Hematological Clue to Allergic Pathogenesis.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo determine the paranasal changes and inflammatory markers that may cause primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) and to determine their relationship with success rates on different types of surgeries. MAIN BODY: We retrospectively reviewed the blood sample and computed tomography (CT) results on 92 patients who underwent dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery for PANDO and 82 healthy controls. Age, gender, paranasal abnormalities, hemogram values, International Normalized Ratio (INR) values, type of surgery, and recurrence rate were recorded; systemic Immune-inflammation Index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocytes-to- lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated in both groups. In the case group, total white blood cells, monocytes, and INR values were significantly lower (p < 0.05). Platelet, lymphocyte, neutrophil, PLR, MLR, NLR, and SII values did not differ significantly between the control and case groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the CT results between the groups (p > 0.05). No correlation was found between CT findings and inflammatory markers. Dacryocystitis (DC) was seen in 20% of patients and they were all in the case group. No correlation was found between recurrence rate and age, gender, type of surgery, CT findings, and blood results (p > 0.05). The recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with bilateral PANDO and with DC (p < 0.05). SHORT
conclusionThe incidence of PANDO may not be directly related to paranasal abnormalities and systemic inflammation. Low INR values may cause obstruction in the nasolacrimal duct. Age, gender, type of surgery, CT findings, and inflammation level do not affect the success of the surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.