ArticleScientific reports2024
Constructing neural networks with pre-specified dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A main goal in neuroscience is to understand the computations carried out by neural populations that give animals their cognitive skills. Neural network models allow to formulate explicit hypotheses regarding the algorithms instantiated in the dynamics of a neural population, its firing statistics, and the underlying connectivity. Neural networks can be defined by a small set of parameters, carefully chosen to procure specific capabilities, or by a large set of free parameters, fitted with optimization algorithms that minimize a given loss function. In this work we alternatively propose a method to make a detailed adjustment of the network dynamics and firing statistic to better answer questions that link dynamics, structure, and function. Our algorithm-termed generalised Firing-to-Parameter (gFTP)-provides a way to construct binary recurrent neural networks whose dynamics strictly follows a user pre-specified transition graph that details the transitions between population firing states triggered by stimulus presentations. Our main contribution is a procedure that detects when a transition graph is not realisable in terms of a neural network, and makes the necessary modifications in order to obtain a new transition graph that is realisable and preserves all the information encoded in the transitions of the original graph. With a realisable transition graph, gFTP assigns values to the network firing states associated with each node in the graph, and finds the synaptic weight matrices by solving a set of linear separation problems. We test gFTP performance by constructing networks with random dynamics, continuous attractor-like dynamics that encode position in 2-dimensional space, and discrete attractor dynamics. We then show how gFTP can be employed as a tool to explore the link between structure, function, and the algorithms instantiated in the network dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.