Observational studyArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Postoperative PFME versus PFME alone for moderate SUI in pre-menopause women and influencing factors: a comparative effectiveness study.
Observational study in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo explore the effectiveness of sling surgery followed by pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) or PFME alone for moderate stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women and its influencing factors.
methodsThis is a prospective observational cohort study investigating whether sling surgery or PFME is preferred for pre-menopause women with moderate uncomplicated SUI. Those who received PFME alone or sling surgery were divided to PT or TVT group, respectively. The primary outcome was objective cure at 12 months. The secondary outcomes included Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form (IIQ-7) scores and PFME adherence.
resultsThe study sample comprised 130 and 74 patients in the PT and TVT groups, respectively. There was 38.2% of patients adhered to PFME twice weekly or more often, and the compliance varied by education level. At 12 months, the objective cure rate was significantly higher in the TVT versus PT group (75.7% vs 47.7%; adjusted OR = 4.27; 95% CI, 2.05-8.87; P < 0.001). In addition, the mean reduction in IIQ-7 scores was greater in the TVT group (16.2 vs 10.0; adjusted OR = 3.38; 95% CI, 1.93-4.82; P < 0.001). However, among patients with lower education or those without adherence to PFME at 12 months, the TVT was also favorized, and the discrepancy in cure rates was greater between the two groups.
conclusionSling procedures followed by PFME demonstrate greater efficacy versus physiotherapy alone for moderate female SUI management. Continued adherence to PFME was important, even for patients undergoing sling procedures. Educational factors influenced patient PFME adherence and the advantage conferred by sling procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39143334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.