Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143329›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

Endoscopic repair of duodenal perforations, a scoping review.

Jennifer Williams, Hansa Joshi, Michael Schwartz, Ami Kalola, Alvin Mercado, Benjamin Saracco, Amanda Adams, Adib Chaaya, Daniel Baik, Adam Elfant and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jennifer WilliamsDepartment of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, 3 Cooper Plaza, Suite 411, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA. Williams-jennifer3@cooperhealth.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2570-4787
Hansa JoshiDepartment of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, 3 Cooper Plaza, Suite 411, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Michael SchwartzDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.
Ami KalolaDepartment of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, 3 Cooper Plaza, Suite 411, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Alvin MercadoCooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA.
Benjamin SaraccoCooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA.
Amanda AdamsCooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA.
Adib ChaayaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.
Daniel BaikDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.
Adam ElfantDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.
Young Ki HongDepartment of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, 3 Cooper Plaza, Suite 411, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a discrepancy in the surgical and endoscopic literature for managing duodenal perforations. Although often managed conservatively, surgical repair is the standard treatment for duodenal perforations. This contrasts with the gastroenterology literature, which now recommends endoscopic repair of duodenal perforations, which are more frequently iatrogenic from the growing field of advanced endoscopic procedures. This study aims to provide a scoping review to summarize the current literature content and quality on endoscopic repair of duodenal perforations.

methodsThe protocol for performing this scoping review was outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. All studies that reported primary outcomes of patients who had undergone endoscopic repair of duodenal perforations before February 2022, regardless of perforation etiology or repair type were reviewed, with studies after 1999 meeting inclusion criteria. The study excluded articles that did not report clinical outcomes of endoscopic repair, articles that did not describe where in the gastrointestinal tract the endoscopic repair occurred, pediatric patients, and animal studies.

results7606 abstracts were screened, with 474 full articles reviewed and 152 studies met inclusion criteria. 560 patients had duodenal perforations repaired endoscopically, with a technical success rate of 90.4% and a survival rate of 86.7%. Most of these perforations (74.5%) were iatrogenic from endoscopic procedures or surgery. Only one randomized control trial (RCT) was found, and 53% of studies were case reports.

conclusionThese results suggest that endoscopic repair could emerge as a viable first-line treatment for duodenal perforation and highlight the need for more high-quality research in this topic.

Indexed as

DuodenumIntestinal PerforationDuodenal DiseasesDuodenoscopyHumansIatrogenic DiseaseDuodenumEndoscopyPerforationRepairReviewSurgery

Identifiers

PMID39143329
PMCPMC11362252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.