Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143324›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Eye tracking study in children to assess mental calculation and eye movements.

Malena Manchado Porras, Carolien A N Knoop-van Campen, Javier J González-Rosa, Francisco L Sánchez-Fernández, José I Navarro Guzmán

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Malena Manchado PorrasDepartment of Psychology, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain. malena.manchado@uca.es.
Carolien A N Knoop-van Campen *Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Javier J González-Rosa *Department of Psychology, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
Francisco L Sánchez-Fernández *Department of Psychology, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
José I Navarro Guzmán *Department of Psychology, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye tracking technology is a high-potential tool for different mathematic cognition research areas. Moreover, there is a dire need for more studies that provide detailed information on the quality of registered eye data. This study aimed to illustrate the applicability of eye tracking in the examination of mathematical cognition, focusing specifically on primary school students completing a computerized mental arithmetic task. Results suggested that the eye tracking device effectively captured high-quality eye movement data when primary school children engaged in this specific task. Furthermore, significant negative correlations have been found between task performance and number of eye fixations. Finally, eye movements distinctions between "Areas of Interest" have been found, indicating different visual tracking associated with different components of arithmetic calculations. This study underscores the extensive possibilities for future research employing eye tracking devices during computerized calculation tasks as assessment tools to explore the complex visual and cognitive processes.

Indexed as

CognitionEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyChildFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMaleMathematicsComputerized taskEye trackingMental arithmeticPrimary education

Identifiers

PMID39143324
PMCPMC11324728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.