ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2024
Psychiatric neuroimaging designs for individualised, cohort, and population studies.
Review in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The geometry of disorder: fractal analysis in psychiatric neuroimaging.European radiology · 2026Article
- Practical considerations for dense longitudinal neuroimaging: Ten simple rules for frequent scanning over short time periods.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neurobiological Signatures of Dyadic Transmission of Fear Extinction in Adolescent Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026Article
- Nonergodicity and Simpson's paradox in neurocognitive dynamics of cognitive control.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Precision Imaging for Intraindividual Investigation of the Reward Response.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Mapping the Digital Mind: A Meta-Analysis of EEG Biomarkers in Cognition, Emotion, and Mental Health.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Limited generalizability of dynamic fMRI correlates of adolescent rumination.Nature. Mental health · 2025Article
- Precision Imaging for Intraindividual Investigation of the Reward Response.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Limited generalizability of dynamic fMRI correlates of adolescent rumination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Multi-voxel pattern analysis for developmental cognitive neuroscientists.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Review
- Longer scans boost prediction and cut costs in brain-wide association studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Group-to-individual generalizability and individual-level inferences in cognitive neuroscience.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025Review
- Functional connectivity heterogeneity and consequences for clinical and cognitive prediction: Stage 2 registered report.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Precision neurodiversity: personalized brain network architecture as a window into cognitive variability.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- Psychiatric neuroimaging at a crossroads: Insights from psychiatric genetics.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Review
- The nature of grief: implications for the neurobiology of emotion.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychiatric neuroimaging faces challenges to rigour and reproducibility that prompt reconsideration of the relative strengths and limitations of study designs. Owing to high resource demands and varying inferential goals, current designs differentially emphasise sample size, measurement breadth, and longitudinal assessments. In this overview and perspective, we provide a guide to the current landscape of psychiatric neuroimaging study designs with respect to this balance of scientific goals and resource constraints. Through a heuristic data cube contrasting key design features, we discuss a resulting trade-off among small sample, precision longitudinal studies (e.g., individualised studies and cohorts) and large sample, minimally longitudinal, population studies. Precision studies support tests of within-person mechanisms, via intervention and tracking of longitudinal course. Population studies support tests of generalisation across multifaceted individual differences. A proposed reciprocal validation model (RVM) aims to recursively leverage these complementary designs in sequence to accumulate evidence, optimise relative strengths, and build towards improved long-term clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.