ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Efficient patient preparation in computed tomography coronary angiography].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the coming years, a significant increase in the number of computed tomography coronary angiographies (CCTA) is expected, leading to an additional burden on existing structures.
objectivesDiscussion of effective processes and patient preparation in the context of high-volume CCTA. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe relevance of patient education and optimized workflows in clinical practice, including pharmacological heart rate control and vasodilation.
resultsTo conduct resource-efficient and effective patient examinations, comprehensive and clear patient education is crucial. This can be provided to the patient during scheduling or delivered digitally, so that the patient arrives with a thorough understanding of the examination process. In addition, targeted optimization of workflows tailored to CCTA is important. For high image quality, the administration of β‑blockers is necessary in most cases. This can be done intravenously to save time. The administration of nitrates immediately before the examination is recommended by current guidelines for all patients without contraindications and is ideally applied sublingually shortly before the examination.
conclusionThe anticipated increase in CCTA will significantly strain existing structures not only in terms of reporting. Especially standardized and structured workflows pre- and periprocedurally are essential for handling a high number of examinations, while maintaining sufficient image quality in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39143254What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.