ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Patient perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer diagnosis on MRI.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Patient Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Patients' and Physicians' Perceptions of AI Integration in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Mixed Methods Study of Challenges to the Patient-Physician Relationship.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The use of generative AI tools among individuals with cancer and their caregivers: a cross-sectional study of awareness, attitudes, and experiences.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Autonomous AI in prostate cancer: the road ahead towards clinical implementation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Constructs Influencing Patient Perceptions of Use of AI in Medical Imaging Analysis: Systematic Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Patients' Perspectives on the Implementation of AI in Radiological Diagnostics: Focus Group Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Prostate MRI: Comparison of an AI-Based Software and an Experienced Radiologist for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Patient Perspectives on Trust in Artificial Intelligence-Powered Tools in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics.Qualitative health research · 2026Article
- Anticipating Moral and Economic Considerations, Opportunities, and Potential Frictions for AI in Medical Imaging: Multistakeholder Cocreation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Beyond the algorithm: embedding ethics for trustworthy AI in radiology and oncology.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- AI in prostate imaging: A workload solution or a new set of challenges?European radiology · 2025Article
- Acceptance of healthcare services based on the large language model in China: a national cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- An MRI-pathology foundation model for noninvasive diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer.Nature cancer · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Biparametric MRI for Detecting Prostate Cancer-A Comparative Multireader Multicase Accuracy Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Patient Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for diagnostics in radiology practice: a rapid systematic scoping review.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Digital support and artificial intelligence in cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy: patient utilization, acceptance and attitudes.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study investigated patients' acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa) on MRI scans and the factors influencing their trust in AI diagnoses. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective, multicenter study was conducted between January and November 2023. Patients undergoing prostate MRI were surveyed about their opinions on hypothetical AI assessment of their MRI scans. The questionnaire included nine items: four on hypothetical scenarios of combinations between AI and the radiologist, two on trust in the diagnosis, and three on accountability for misdiagnosis. Relationships between the items and independent variables were assessed using multivariate analysis.
resultsA total of 212 PCa suspicious patients undergoing prostate MRI were included. The majority preferred AI involvement in their PCa diagnosis alongside a radiologist, with 91% agreeing with AI as the primary reader and 79% as the secondary reader. If AI has a high certainty diagnosis, 15% of the respondents would accept it as the sole decision-maker. Autonomous AI outperforming radiologists would be accepted by 52%. Higher educated persons tended to accept AI when it would outperform radiologists (p < 0.05). The respondents indicated that the hospital (76%), radiologist (70%), and program developer (55%) should be held accountable for misdiagnosis.
conclusionsPatients favor AI involvement alongside radiologists in PCa diagnosis. Trust in AI diagnosis depends on the patient's education level and the AI performance, with autonomous AI acceptance by a small majority on the condition that AI outperforms a radiologist. Respondents held the hospital, radiologist, and program developers accountable for misdiagnosis in descending order of accountability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Patients show a high level of acceptance for AI-assisted prostate cancer diagnosis on MRI, either alongside radiologists or fully autonomous, particularly if it demonstrates superior performance to radiologists alone. KEY POINTS: Prostate cancer suspicious patients may accept autonomous AI based on performance. Patients prefer AI involvement alongside a radiologist in diagnosing prostate cancer. Patients indicate accountability for AI should be shared among multiple stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.