Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143184›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A comparative study of learning curves among general surgery residents for intraoperative ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.

Hakan Balbaloglu, Hatice Tekin, Ipek Yorgancioglu, Ilhan Tasdoven, Ufuk Tali, Mustafa Comert, Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hakan BalbalogluDepartment of General Surgery, Bülent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Bülent Ecevit University, 67630, Esenköy-Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey. hakanbalbaloglu@yahoo.com.
Hatice TekinDepartment of General Surgery, Bülent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Bülent Ecevit University, 67630, Esenköy-Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Ipek YorganciogluDepartment of General Surgery, Bülent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Bülent Ecevit University, 67630, Esenköy-Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Ilhan TasdovenDepartment of General Surgery, Bülent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Bülent Ecevit University, 67630, Esenköy-Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Ufuk TaliDepartment of General Surgery, Bülent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Bülent Ecevit University, 67630, Esenköy-Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Mustafa ComertDepartment of General Surgery, Bülent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Bülent Ecevit University, 67630, Esenköy-Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Guldeniz Karadeniz CakmakDepartment of General Surgery, Bülent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Bülent Ecevit University, 67630, Esenköy-Kozlu, Zonguldak, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy is preferred for early-stage breast cancer because its survival rate is equivalent to that of mastectomy. Achieving negative surgical margins in BCS is crucial to minimize the risk of recurrence. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) enhances surgical accuracy, but its efficacy is operator dependent. This study aimed to compare the success of achieving negative margins using IOUS between an experienced breast surgeon and general surgical residents and to evaluate the learning curve for the residents. A prospective study involving 96 patients with BCS who underwent IOUS guidance was conducted. Both the breast surgeon and residents assessed the surgical margins using IOUS, with the breast surgeon making the final margin adequacy decision. Permanent histopathological analysis was used to confirm the status of the margins and was considered the gold standard for comparison. The breast surgeon accurately assessed the margin status in all 96 cases (100% accuracy), with 93 negative and three positive margins. All of these were ductal carcinomas in situ. Initially, the residents demonstrated low accuracy rates in predicting margin positivity using intraoperative ultrasonography. However, the learning curves of the three residents demonstrated that, with an average 12th case onwards, a significant improvement in the cumulative accuracy rates was observed, which reached the level of the breast surgeon. IOUS is an effective tool for accurately predicting the margin status in BCS, with an acceptable learning curve for novice surgeons. Training and experience are pivotal for optimizing surgical outcomes. These findings support the integration of IOUS training into surgical education programs to enhance proficiency and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsInternship and ResidencyLearning CurveMastectomy, SegmentalAdultAgedClinical CompetenceFemaleGeneral SurgeryHumansMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurgery, Computer-AssistedBreast-conserving surgeryIntraoperative ultrasoundLearning curveSurgical margins

Identifiers

PMID39143184
PMCPMC11324754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.