ArticleBone marrow transplantation2024
Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 mutations predict better outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a study of the ALWP of the EBMT.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- New drugs before, during, and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2023Review
- Prognostic impact of clinico-genetic characteristics and donor types inCell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) mutations have uncertain prognostic implications in AML. We investigate the impact IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in AML patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in first complete remission (CR1). In total, 1515 adult patients were included, 15.91% (n = 241) carried IDH1 mutation (mIDH1), and 26.27% (n = 398) IDH2 mutation (mIDH2) and 57.82% (n = 876) had no-IDH mutation. NPM1 was frequently encountered with IDH1 mutation (no-IDH group, n = 217, 24.8%, mIDH1, n = 103, 42.7%, mIDH2, n = 111, 27.9%, p < 0.0001). At day 180, the cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was significantly lower in mIDH1 and mIDH2 compared to no-IDH groups (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66 (95% CI 0.47-0.91), p = 0.011; HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.56-0.96), p = 0.025, respectively). In the mIDH1 group, overall survival (OS) was improved compared to no-IDH (HR = 0.68 (95% CI 0.48-0.94), p = 0.021), whereas mIDH2 was associated with lower incidence of relapse (HR = 0.49 (95% CI 0.34-0.7), p < 0.001), improved leukemia free survival (LFS) (HR = 0.7 (95% CI 0.55-0.9), p = 0.004) and OS (HR = 0.74 (95% CI 0.56-0.97), p = 0.027). In the subgroup of NPM1 wild type, only IDH2 was associated with improved outcomes. In conclusion, our data suggest that IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are associated with improved outcomes in patients with AML undergoing allo-HCT in CR1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39143183What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.