Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143180›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Automatic detection and visualization of temporomandibular joint effusion with deep neural network.

Yeon-Hee Lee, Seonggwang Jeon, Jong-Hyun Won, Q-Schick Auh, Yung-Kyun Noh

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Decoding adolescent TMJ osteoarthritis with multimodal machine learning.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frequency TMJ disc displacements.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yeon-Hee Lee *Department of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry, #613 Hoegi-Dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Korea. omod0209@gmail.com.
Seonggwang JeonDepartment of Computer Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Korea.
Jong-Hyun WonDepartment of Computer Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Korea.
Q-Schick AuhDepartment of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry, #613 Hoegi-Dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Korea.
Yung-Kyun Noh *Department of Computer Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Korea. nohyung@hanyang.ac.kr.

Funding

IITP/MSIT Artificial Intelligence Graduate School Program for Hanyang University 2020-0-01373Kyung Hee University in 2021 KHU-20211863National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1F1A1070072National Research Foundation of Korea 2021M3E5D2A01019545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the usefulness of deep learning-based automatic detection of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) effusion using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with temporomandibular disorder and whether the diagnostic accuracy of the model improved when patients' clinical information was provided in addition to MRI images. The sagittal MR images of 2948 TMJs were collected from 1017 women and 457 men (mean age 37.19 ± 18.64 years). The TMJ effusion diagnostic performances of three convolutional neural networks (scratch, fine-tuning, and freeze schemes) were compared with those of human experts based on areas under the curve (AUCs) and diagnosis accuracies. The fine-tuning model with proton density (PD) images showed acceptable prediction performance (AUC = 0.7895), and the from-scratch (0.6193) and freeze (0.6149) models showed lower performances (p < 0.05). The fine-tuning model had excellent specificity compared to the human experts (87.25% vs. 58.17%). However, the human experts were superior in sensitivity (80.00% vs. 57.43%) (all p < 0.001). In gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) visualizations, the fine-tuning scheme focused more on effusion than on other structures of the TMJ, and the sparsity was higher than that of the from-scratch scheme (82.40% vs. 49.83%, p < 0.05). The Grad-CAM visualizations agreed with the model learned through important features in the TMJ area, particularly around the articular disc. Two fine-tuning models on PD and T2-weighted images showed that the diagnostic performance did not improve compared with using PD alone (p < 0.05). Diverse AUCs were observed across each group when the patients were divided according to age (0.7083-0.8375) and sex (male:0.7576, female:0.7083). The prediction accuracy of the ensemble model was higher than that of the human experts when all the data were used (74.21% vs. 67.71%, p < 0.05). A deep neural network (DNN) was developed to process multimodal data, including MRI and patient clinical data. Analysis of four age groups with the DNN model showed that the 41-60 age group had the best performance (AUC = 0.8258). The fine-tuning model and DNN were optimal for judging TMJ effusion and may be used to prevent true negative cases and aid in human diagnostic performance. Assistive automated diagnostic methods have the potential to increase clinicians' diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerTemporomandibular JointTemporomandibular Joint DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkDeep learningEffusionTemporomandibular disorderTemporomandibular joint

Identifiers

PMID39143180
PMCPMC11324909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.