Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143145›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Identifying COVID-19 survivors living with post-traumatic stress disorder through machine learning on Twitter.

Anees Baqir, Mubashir Ali, Shaista Jaffar, Hafiz Husnain Raza Sherazi, Mark Lee, Ali Kashif Bashir, Maryam M Al Dabel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anees BaqirComplex Human Behavior Laboratory, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy.
Mubashir AliSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Shaista JaffarNational Drug and Treatment Center, Dublin, Ireland.
Hafiz Husnain Raza SheraziSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. Husnain.Sherazi@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8152-4065
Mark LeeSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ali Kashif BashirDepartment of Computing and Mathematics, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Maryam M Al DabelDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafar Al-Batin, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted people's lives and caused significant economic damage around the world, but its impact on people's mental health has not been paid due attention by the research community. According to anecdotal data, the pandemic has raised serious concerns related to mental health among the masses. However, no systematic investigations have been conducted previously on mental health monitoring and, in particular, detection of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The goal of this study is to use classical machine learning approaches to classify tweets into COVID-PTSD positive or negative categories. To this end, we employed various Machine Learning (ML) classifiers, to segregate the psychotic difficulties with the user's PTSD in the context of COVID-19, including Random Forest Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, and K-Nearest Neighbor. ML models are trained and tested using various combinations of feature selection strategies to get the best possible combination. Based on our experimentation on real-world dataset, we demonstrate our model's effectiveness to perform classification with an accuracy of 83.29% using Support Vector Machine as classifier and unigram as a feature pattern.

Indexed as

COVID-19Machine LearningSocial MediaStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSupport Vector MachineSurvivorsBayes TheoremHumansMental HealthSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39143145
PMCPMC11325037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.