Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143116›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Impact of acute stress on the canine gut microbiota.

Krusha V Patel, Alysia B G Hunt, Juan Castillo-Fernandez, Christine Abrams, Tammie King, Phillip Watson, Gregory C A Amos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Role of Olfaction in Dogs: Evolution, Biology, and Human-Oriented Work.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Understanding the diversity and roles of the canine gut microbiome.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Krusha V PatelWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Freeby Lane, Waltham On the Wolds, Leicestershire, LE14 4RT, UK. Krusha.Patel@effem.com.
Alysia B G HuntWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Freeby Lane, Waltham On the Wolds, Leicestershire, LE14 4RT, UK.
Juan Castillo-FernandezWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Freeby Lane, Waltham On the Wolds, Leicestershire, LE14 4RT, UK.
Christine AbramsWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Freeby Lane, Waltham On the Wolds, Leicestershire, LE14 4RT, UK.
Tammie KingWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Freeby Lane, Waltham On the Wolds, Leicestershire, LE14 4RT, UK.
Phillip WatsonWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Freeby Lane, Waltham On the Wolds, Leicestershire, LE14 4RT, UK.
Gregory C A AmosWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Freeby Lane, Waltham On the Wolds, Leicestershire, LE14 4RT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing evidence that a relationship exists between mental and emotional wellbeing and the gut microbiota. Little is known regarding how the microbiota reacts to repeated acute stress events in dogs, and whether it is a predictor of stress response. In this study, we explored the impact on the gut microbiota and digestive health with two common events many pet dogs find stressful. Twenty healthy adult dogs, living within a colony, were exposed to either car travel or separation three times across eight-week intervals. Faecal samples were collected 24 h before, within 24 h, and 24-48 h after. Faecal quality and pH, and microbiota diversity and composition were analysed in context with wider published work on physiological stress measures. No significant changes were observed in faecal quality or pH with either stress event at any timepoint, indicating all pets remained in good digestive health. Microbiota analysis demonstrated no significant impact on alpha or beta diversity with either stressor. Microbial signatures previously linked to stress were not identified in these dogs and no changes were observed in the functional gut composition. Irrespective of whether the pet was considered "stressed" (i.e., exhibited an increase in serum cortisol), there was no effect on the microbiota and no taxa were predictive of stress response. Collectively, this work demonstrates, for this population, certain acute stress events have no meaningful impact on the canine gut microbiota, and it has no impact on the associated stress response.

Indexed as

FecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeStress, PsychologicalAnimalsDogsFemaleMaleStress, PhysiologicalCar travelDogFaecesMicrobiotaSeparationStress

Identifiers

PMID39143116
PMCPMC11324789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.