ArticleScientific data2024
The NACOB multi-surface walking dataset.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The COMPWALK-ACL: A Dataset of Multi-pace IMU Gait Kinematics in Adolescents, Adults, and ACL Injured Patients.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Walking is a fundamental aspect of human movement, and understanding how irregular surfaces impact gait is crucial. Existing gait research often relies on laboratory settings with ideal surfaces, limiting the applicability of findings to real-world scenarios. While some irregular surface datasets exist, they are often small or lack biomechanical gait data. In this paper, we introduce a new irregular surface dataset with 134 participants walking on surfaces of varying irregularity, equipped with inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors on the trunk and lower right limb (foot, shank, and thigh). Collected during the North American Congress on Biomechanics conference in 2022, the dataset aims to provide a valuable resource for studying biomechanical adaptations to irregular surfaces. We provide the detailed experimental protocol, as well as a technical validation in which we developed a machine learning model to predict the walking surface. The resulting model achieved an accuracy score of 95.8%, demonstrating the discriminating biomechanical characteristics of the dataset's irregular surface gait data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.