Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143109›Full record

ArticleScientific data2024

The NACOB multi-surface walking dataset.

Oussama Jlassi, Vaibhav Shah, Philippe C Dixon

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oussama JlassiMcGill University, Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-6894-4403
Vaibhav ShahUniversité de Montréal, Biomedical Engineering Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Philippe C DixonMcGill University, Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Montreal, Canada. philippe.dixon@mcgill.ca.

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé (Fonds de la recherche en sante du Quebec) research scholar award (Junior 1)Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RRGPIN-2022-04217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Walking is a fundamental aspect of human movement, and understanding how irregular surfaces impact gait is crucial. Existing gait research often relies on laboratory settings with ideal surfaces, limiting the applicability of findings to real-world scenarios. While some irregular surface datasets exist, they are often small or lack biomechanical gait data. In this paper, we introduce a new irregular surface dataset with 134 participants walking on surfaces of varying irregularity, equipped with inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors on the trunk and lower right limb (foot, shank, and thigh). Collected during the North American Congress on Biomechanics conference in 2022, the dataset aims to provide a valuable resource for studying biomechanical adaptations to irregular surfaces. We provide the detailed experimental protocol, as well as a technical validation in which we developed a machine learning model to predict the walking surface. The resulting model achieved an accuracy score of 95.8%, demonstrating the discriminating biomechanical characteristics of the dataset's irregular surface gait data.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID39143109
PMCPMC11324723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.