ArticleNPJ breast cancer2024
Dose dense versus 3 weekly AC during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for triple negative breast cancer.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neoadjuvant dose-dense anthracycline and cyclophosphamide in combination with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab for triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Pooled it
- [Anthracycline use in breast cancer based on our current knowledge].Magyar onkologia · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant therapy for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer: Current evidence, clinical boundaries and emerging strategies (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Chronotherapeutic administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces cancer-related fatigue-like behavior.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026Article
- Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the predictive role of DNA damage response biomarkers in TNBC: the NeoCarbo study.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in older patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: real-world insights from neo-real/GBECAM-0123.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Immune-related adverse events among patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy: real-world data from the Neo-Real/GBECAM 0123 study.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Article
- Pathologic complete response rates of patients with ER-low/HER2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in the neo-real study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk early breast cancer: its role in the era of personalised oncology.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Clinico-pathological factors predicting pathological response in early triple-negative breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts long-term survival in early triple negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (P + CT) has emerged as a standard of care for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the best anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) schedule remains to be determined. While the KEYNOTE-522 regimen employs AC every 3 weeks (q3w AC), previous studies have shown overall survival benefits of dose-dense regimens for early-stage breast cancer. The Neo-Real study (GBECAM-0123) is a real-world data effort evaluating patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant P + CT in ten cancer centers since July 2020. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dose-dense AC (ddAC) versus q3w AC. Among 333 patients included until November 2023, 311 completed neoadjuvant therapy and 279 underwent surgery with pathology reports available; ddAC was used in 58.2% and q3w AC in 41.8% of the cases. Most patients (69.1%) had stage II TNBC. A pCR was observed in 65.4% with ddAC and 58.7% with q3w AC (P = 0.260), while RCB 0-1 occurred in 82.4% and 73.5%, respectively (P = 0.115). Patients with stage III disease had a numerically higher pCR with ddAC (59% vs 40%, P = 0.155), while pCR rates were similar regardless of AC regimen in stage II disease (66.6% vs 64.5%; P = 0.760). While no significant disparities in drug discontinuation was noted, ddAC showed a trend towards higher rates of grade ≥3 AE (40.5% vs. 30.7%, P = 0.092). The Neo-Real study could not rule out a difference between ddAC and q3w AC during neoadjuvant P + CT. The observation of a potentially higher pCR with ddAC in stage III disease warrants further investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.