Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143082›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2024

Dose dense versus 3 weekly AC during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for triple negative breast cancer.

Renata Colombo Bonadio, Isadora Martins de Sousa, Flávia Cavalcanti Balint, Ana Carolina Marin Comini, Monique Celeste Tavares, Fernanda Madasi, Jose Bines, Rafael Dal Ponte Ferreira, Daniela Dornelles Rosa, Candice Lima Santos and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Renata Colombo BonadioInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5818-922X
Isadora Martins de SousaA.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Flávia Cavalcanti BalintA.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Marin CominiA.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Monique Celeste TavaresA.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda MadasiInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jose BinesGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2465-8854
Rafael Dal Ponte FerreiraServiço de Oncologia, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Daniela Dornelles RosaGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Candice Lima SantosInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5215-5085
Zenaide Silva de SouzaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasília, Brazil.
Daniele Assad-SuzukiGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Júlio Antônio Pereira de AraújoGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Débora de Melo GagliatoGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Henrique Dos AnjosGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruna M ZucchettiGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Anezka FerrariDASA Oncology, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mayana Lopes de BritoGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata CangussuGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Marcela Fernandes MonteiroInstituto do Câncer do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Paulo M HoffInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil.
Laura TestaInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6080-7429
Romualdo Barroso-SousaGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil. romualdo.sousa.ext@dasa.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1825-9876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (P + CT) has emerged as a standard of care for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the best anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) schedule remains to be determined. While the KEYNOTE-522 regimen employs AC every 3 weeks (q3w AC), previous studies have shown overall survival benefits of dose-dense regimens for early-stage breast cancer. The Neo-Real study (GBECAM-0123) is a real-world data effort evaluating patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant P + CT in ten cancer centers since July 2020. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dose-dense AC (ddAC) versus q3w AC. Among 333 patients included until November 2023, 311 completed neoadjuvant therapy and 279 underwent surgery with pathology reports available; ddAC was used in 58.2% and q3w AC in 41.8% of the cases. Most patients (69.1%) had stage II TNBC. A pCR was observed in 65.4% with ddAC and 58.7% with q3w AC (P = 0.260), while RCB 0-1 occurred in 82.4% and 73.5%, respectively (P = 0.115). Patients with stage III disease had a numerically higher pCR with ddAC (59% vs 40%, P = 0.155), while pCR rates were similar regardless of AC regimen in stage II disease (66.6% vs 64.5%; P = 0.760). While no significant disparities in drug discontinuation was noted, ddAC showed a trend towards higher rates of grade ≥3 AE (40.5% vs. 30.7%, P = 0.092). The Neo-Real study could not rule out a difference between ddAC and q3w AC during neoadjuvant P + CT. The observation of a potentially higher pCR with ddAC in stage III disease warrants further investigation.

Identifiers

PMID39143082
PMCPMC11324725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.