Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39143069›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Dimensions of wisdom perception across twelve countries on five continents.

M Rudnev, H C Barrett, W Buckwalter, E Machery, S Stich, K Barr, A Bencherifa, R F Clancy, D L Crone, Y Deguchi and 24 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Metajudgment: Metatheories and Beliefs About Good Judgment Across Societies.Current directions in psychological science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

M RudnevUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. maksim.rudnev@uwaterloo.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2714-3840
H C BarrettUCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4157-6511
W BuckwalterGeorge Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
E MacheryUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
S StichRutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
K BarrUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7048-4977
A BencherifaUniversity of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
R F ClancyVirginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
D L CroneNortheastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Y DeguchiKyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
E FabianoUniversity of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8195-0408
A D FodemanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA.
B GuennounIbn Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco.ORCID 0009-0004-9359-764X
J HalamováComenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-2655-2327
T HashimotoToyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
J HomanUniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
M KanovskýComenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-6055-6551
K KarasawaThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
H KimKorea University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8209-7621
J KiperUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6249-2432
M LeeSeoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2366-7783
X LiuWuhan University, Wuhan, China.
V MitovaUniversity of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4181-8170
R B NairUniversity of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
L PantovicUniversity of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
B PorterUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6185-4072
P QuintanillaUniversity of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4588-3188
J ReijerUniversity of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2703-9311
P P RomeroUniversidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-2616-4498
P SinghIndian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India.
S TberUniversité Internationale de Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.ORCID 0009-0002-4245-8207
D A WilkenfeldUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
L YiUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
I GrossmannUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. igrossma@uwaterloo.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2681-3600

Funding

Gouvernement du Canada | Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada) 435-2014-0685John Templeton Foundation (JTF) 60813John Templeton Foundation (JTF) 62260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wisdom is the hallmark of social judgment, but how people across cultures recognize wisdom remains unclear-distinct philosophical traditions suggest different views of wisdom's cardinal features. We explore perception of wise minds across 16 socio-economically and culturally diverse convenience samples from 12 countries. Participants assessed wisdom exemplars, non-exemplars, and themselves on 19 socio-cognitive characteristics, subsequently rating targets' wisdom, knowledge, and understanding. Analyses reveal two positively related dimensions-Reflective Orientation and Socio-Emotional Awareness. These dimensions are consistent across the studied cultural regions and interact when informing wisdom ratings: wisest targets-as perceived by participants-score high on both dimensions, whereas the least wise are not reflective but moderately socio-emotional. Additionally, individuals view themselves as less reflective but more socio-emotionally aware than most wisdom exemplars. Our findings expand folk psychology and social judgment research beyond the Global North, showing how individuals perceive desirable cognitive and socio-emotional qualities, and contribute to an understanding of mind perception.

Indexed as

JudgmentAdolescentAdultCognitionCross-Cultural ComparisonEmotionsFemaleHumansKnowledgeMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionSocial PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39143069
PMCPMC11324649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.