Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39142675›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Does regional implementation of a clinical pathway for older adult patients with pelvic fragility fractures after low-energy trauma improve patient outcomes (PELVIC): a multicentre, stepped-wedge, randomised controlled trial.

Anna H M Mennen, Marte Lommerse, Robert Hemke, Hanna C Willems, Mario Maas, Frank W Bloemers, Kees Jan Ponsen, Daphne Van Embden

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06054165 (Impact of Regional Implementation of a Clinical Pathway for ELderly Patients With pelVIc Fragility fraCtures), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06054165 narecruitingnot on this map

Impact of Regional Implementation of a Clinical Pathway for ELderly Patients With pelVIc Fragility fraCtures (PELVIC); a Multicenter, Stepped-wedge Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2024 to 2027Enrolled393ConditionsPelvic Bone Injury, Sacral Fracture, Pelvic Fracture, Fragility FractureArmsClinical pathway
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna H M MennenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands a.h.mennen@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0436-6133
Marte LommerseDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert HemkeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hanna C WillemsDepartment of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mario MaasDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank W BloemersDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kees Jan PonsenDepartment of Surgery, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Daphne Van EmbdenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with pelvic fragility fractures suffer from high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the high incidence, there is currently no regional or nationwide treatment protocol which results in a wide variety of clinical practices. Recently, there have been new insights into treatment strategies, such as early diagnosis and minimally invasive operative treatment. The aim of this study is to implement an evidence-based and experience-based treatment clinical pathway to improve outcomes in this fragile patient population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be a regional stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. All older adult patients (≥50 years old) who suffered a pelvic fragility fracture after low-energetic trauma are eligible for inclusion. The pathway aims to optimise the diagnostic process, to guide the decision-making process for further treatment (eg, operative or conservative), to structure the follow-up and to provide guidelines on pain management, weight-bearing and osteoporosis workup. The primary outcome is mobility, measured by the Parker Mobility Score. Secondary outcomes are mobility measured by the Elderly Mobility Scale, functional performance, quality of life, return to home rate, level of pain, type and dosage of analgesic medications, the number of falls after treatment, the number of (fracture-related) complications, 1-year and 2-year mortality. Every 6 weeks, a cluster will switch from current practice to the clinical pathway. The aim is a total of 393 inclusions, which provides an 80% statistical power for an improvement in mobility of 10%, measured by the Parker mobility score. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Medical Research Ethics Committee of Academic Medical Center has exempted the PELVIC study from the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO). Informed consent will be obtained using the opt-out method and research data will be stored in a database and handled confidentially. The final study report will be shared via publication without restrictions from funding parties and regardless of the outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06054165. PROTOCOL VERSION: V.1.0, 19 July 2022.

Indexed as

Pelvic BonesAgedCritical PathwaysFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicOsteoporotic FracturesPain ManagementQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicadult orthopaedicsagedorthopaedic & trauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID39142675
PMCPMC11331913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.