Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39142598›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2024

On the role of the UMLS in supporting diagnosis generation proposed by Large Language Models.

Majid Afshar, Yanjun Gao, Deepak Gupta, Emma Croxford, Dina Demner-Fushman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prompt Engineering in Clinical Practice: Tutorial for Clinicians.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Majid AfsharUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, 53726, WI, USA. Electronic address: majid.afshar@wisc.edu.
Yanjun GaoUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, 53726, WI, USA.
Deepak GuptaNational Library of Medicine, NIH, HHS, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, 20894, MD, USA.
Emma CroxfordUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, 53726, WI, USA.
Dina Demner-FushmanNational Library of Medicine, NIH, HHS, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, 20894, MD, USA.

Funding

Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
Providing timely and effortless access to reliable health-related information for decision support and educationZIALM010019 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI DEMNER-FUSHMAN, DINA · 2021 to 2025
$12.0M
Data Driven Strategies for Substance Misuse Identification in Hospitalized PatientsR01DA051464 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Majid Afshar · 2020 to 2026
$4.5M
Learning Universal Patient Representations with Hierarchical TransformersR01LM012973 · NLM · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Timothy A Miller · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
Developing and Evaluating Multi-Modal Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning Models for Automated Diagnosis GenerationR00LM014308 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Yanjun Gao · 2024 to 2026
$726k
Developing and Evaluating Multi-Modal Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning Models for Automated Diagnosis GenerationK99LM014308 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GAO, YANJUN · 2023 to 2023
$87k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA051464NLM NIH HHS K99 LM014308NLM NIH HHS R00 LM014308NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012973NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTraditional knowledge-based and machine learning diagnostic decision support systems have benefited from integrating the medical domain knowledge encoded in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) to supplant traditional systems poses questions of the quality and extent of the medical knowledge in the models' internal knowledge representations and the need for external knowledge sources. The objective of this study is three-fold: to probe the diagnosis-related medical knowledge of popular LLMs, to examine the benefit of providing the UMLS knowledge to LLMs (grounding the diagnosis predictions), and to evaluate the correlations between human judgments and the UMLS-based metrics for generations by LLMs.

methodsWe evaluated diagnoses generated by LLMs from consumer health questions and daily care notes in the electronic health records using the ConsumerQA and Problem Summarization datasets. Probing LLMs for the UMLS knowledge was performed by prompting the LLM to complete the diagnosis-related UMLS knowledge paths. Grounding the predictions was examined in an approach that integrated the UMLS graph paths and clinical notes in prompting the LLMs. The results were compared to prompting without the UMLS paths. The final experiments examined the alignment of different evaluation metrics, UMLS-based and non-UMLS, with human expert evaluation.

resultsIn probing the UMLS knowledge, GPT-3.5 significantly outperformed Llama2 and a simple baseline yielding an F1 score of 10.9% in completing one-hop UMLS paths for a given concept. Grounding diagnosis predictions with the UMLS paths improved the results for both models on both tasks, with the highest improvement (4%) in SapBERT score. There was a weak correlation between the widely used evaluation metrics (ROUGE and SapBERT) and human judgments.

conclusionWe found that while popular LLMs contain some medical knowledge in their internal representations, augmentation with the UMLS knowledge provides performance gains around diagnosis generation. The UMLS needs to be tailored for the task to improve the LLMs predictions. Finding evaluation metrics that are aligned with human judgments better than the traditional ROUGE and BERT-based scores remains an open research question.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsUnified Medical Language SystemDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingArtificial intelligenceDifferential diagnosesEvaluation methodologyKnowledge representation (computer)Natural language processingUnified medical language system

Identifiers

PMID39142598
PMCPMC11402555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.