Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39142570›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2024

Identifying momentary suicidal ideation using machine learning in patients at high-risk for suicide.

M L Bozzay, C D Hughes, C Eickhoff, H Schatten, M F Armey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Predicting Next-Day Passive Suicidal Ideation in At-Risk Youth.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M L BozzayDepartment of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Box G-BH, Providence, RI 02912, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 370 W. 9th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States. Electronic address: Melanie.Bozzay@osumc.edu.
C D HughesDepartment of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Box G-BH, Providence, RI 02912, United States; Department of Psychosocial Research, Butler Hospital, 345 Blackstone Blvd., Providence, RI 02906, United States.
C EickhoffSchool of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Schaffhausenstr. 77, 72072 Tübingen, Germany.
H SchattenDepartment of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Box G-BH, Providence, RI 02912, United States; Department of Psychosocial Research, Butler Hospital, 345 Blackstone Blvd., Providence, RI 02906, United States.
M F ArmeyDepartment of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Box G-BH, Providence, RI 02912, United States; Department of Psychosocial Research, Butler Hospital, 345 Blackstone Blvd., Providence, RI 02906, United States.

Funding

Multi-Method Assessment of Emotion Reactivity: Translational Research in SuicideR01MH095786 · NIMH · BUTLER HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI ARMEY, MICHAEL F, MILLER, IVAN W. · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
Dynamic Impacts of Sleep Disruption on Ecologically Assessed Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive Risk Factors for SuicideR01MH124832 · NIMH · BUTLER HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI ARMEY, MICHAEL F, BOZZAY, MELANIE · 2021 to 2024
$2.2M
Behavioral and Ecological Suicide Tracking: Attention, Interpretation, and MemoryR01MH097741 · NIMH · BUTLER HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI ARMEY, MICHAEL F, MILLER, IVAN W. · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095786NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097741NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrategies to detect the presence of suicidal ideation (SI) or characteristics of ideation that indicate marked suicide risk are critically needed to guide interventions and improve care during care transition periods. Some studies indicate that machine learning can be applied to momentary data to improve classification of SI. This study examined whether the classification accuracy of these models varies as a function of type of training data or characteristics of ideation.

methodsA total of 257 psychiatric inpatients completed a 3-week battery of ecological momentary assessment and measures of suicide risk factors. The accuracy of machine learning models in classifying the presence, duration, or intensity of ideation was compared across models trained on baseline and/or momentary suicide risk data. Relative feature importance metrics were examined to identify the risk factors that were most important for outcome classification.

resultsModels including both baseline and momentary features outperformed models with only one feature type, providing important information in both correctly classifying and differentiating individual characteristics of SI. Models classifying SI presence, duration, and intensity performed similarly. LIMITATIONS: Results of this study may not generalize beyond a high-risk, psychiatric inpatient sample, and additional work is needed to examine temporal ordering of the relationships identified.

conclusionsOur results support using machine learning approaches for accurate identification of SI characteristics and underscore the importance of understanding the factors that differentiate and drive different characteristics of SI. Expansion of this work can support use of these models to guide intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSuicidal IdeationAdultEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSuicideYoung AdultEcological momentary assessmentProximal risk

Identifiers

PMID39142570
PMCPMC11366307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.