Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39141903›Full record

ArticleJournal of participatory medicine2024

Shifting Grounds-Facilitating Self-Care in Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections Through the Use of Self-Test Technology: Qualitative Study.

Bettina Trettin, Mette Maria Skjøth, Nadja Trier Munk, Tine Vestergaard, Charlotte Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of participatory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bettina TrettinDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3851-7294
Mette Maria SkjøthDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3528-4619
Nadja Trier MunkDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8198-191X
Tine VestergaardDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7210-8884
Charlotte NielsenClinical Institute, Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8920-7758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChlamydia remains prevalent worldwide and is considered a global public health problem. However, testing rates among young sexually active people remain low. Effective clinical management relies on screening asymptomatic patients. However, attending face-to-face consultations of testing for sexually transmitted infections is associated with stigmatization and anxiety. Self-testing technology (STT) allows patients to test themselves for chlamydia and gonorrhea without the presence of health care professionals. This may result in wider access to testing and increase testing uptake. Therefore, the sexual health clinic at Odense University Hospital has designed and developed a technology that allows patients to get tested at the clinic through self-collected sampling without a face-to-face consultation.

objectiveThis study aimed to (1) pilot-test STT used in clinical practice and (2) investigate the experiences of patients who have completed a self-test for chlamydia and gonorrhea.

methodsThe study was conducted as a qualitative study inspired by the methodology of participatory design. Ethnographic methods were applied in the feasibility study and the data analyzed were inspired by the action research spiral in iterative processes using steps, such as plan, act, observe, and reflect. The qualitative evaluation study used semistructured interviews and data were analyzed using a qualitative 3-level analytical model.

resultsThe findings from the feasibility study, such as lack of signposting and adequate information, led to the final modifications of the self-test technology and made it possible to implement it in clinical practice. The qualitative evaluation study found that self-testing was seen as more appealing than testing at a face-to-face consultation because it was an easy solution that both saved time and allowed for the freedom to plan the visit independently. Security was experienced when the instructions balanced between being detail-oriented while also being simple and illustrative. The anonymity and discretion contributed to preserving privacy and removed the fear of an awkward conversation or being judged by health care professionals thus leading to the reduction of intrusive feelings.

conclusionsAccessible health care services are crucial in preventing and reducing the impact of sexually transmitted infections and STT may have the potential to increase testing uptake as it takes into account some of the barriers that exist. The pilot test and evaluation have resulted in a fully functioning implementation of STT in clinical practice.

Indexed as

asymptomatic screeningchlamydiaChlamydia trachomatishealth screeninglymphogranuloma venereumparticipationparticipatoryparticipatory designqualitativescreeningself-testself-testingsexually transmittedsexually transmitted diseasessexually transmitted illnesssexually transmitted illnessesSTDSTDsSTISTIstesting uptake

Identifiers

PMID39141903
PMCPMC11358652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.